LEGO SYSTEM Space : 27767


Space / 27767	27766 \| 27768

Subject:	Re: If we are changing the Moonbase standards then why not...
Newsgroups:	lugnet.space
Date:	Tue, 2 Sep 2003 23:38:13 GMT
Viewed:	489 times

In lugnet.space, Mike Petrucelli wrote: > The only thing I can figure 10 high intervals has going for it is the > ease of numbers. (ie. 10,20,30... as opposed to 12,24,36...) That just > seems a very silly reason to adopt 10 high > as standard to me. What about this? http://guide.lugnet.com/partsref/search.cgi?q=monorail Monorail works in intervals of 10 bricks. --Bram

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: If we are changing the Moonbase standards then why not...
(...) Ah... So that is where the idea came from. Well I have to wonder if the potential benefits of making 12 high intervals and simply adding the neccesary bricks to the monorail stanchions (given most of the track would be on the modules anyways, (...) (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: If we are changing the Moonbase standards then why not...
(...) A single plate thickness for a floor won't even come close to cutting it for the moonbase I plan on building. (URL) Really, I think 10 high intervals would be too limiting for people that want to make 2 levels in between corridor levels. Isn't (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)

10 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search