To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 27809
27808  |  27810
Subject: 
Re: Monorail (was: If we are changing the Moonbase standards then why not...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Wed, 3 Sep 2003 17:00:38 GMT
Viewed: 
1017 times
  
In lugnet.space, Mike Petrucelli wrote:
I see the whole point of 10 high now. That being to make multi-level
monorail layouts line up.

Exactly.
  I think the main reason there aren't more modules with connections for
monorail is because there is no standard for adding it yet.
  A monorail adds a great deal of motion and interest for kids at a public
display,  Even though monorails are no longer produced, I think there are enough
people with big monorail collections to make it worth it to create a better
standard for supporting monorail in the layout.
--Bram



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: If we are changing the Moonbase standards then why not...
 
(...) Ah... So that is where the idea came from. Well I have to wonder if the potential benefits of making 12 high intervals and simply adding the neccesary bricks to the monorail stanchions (given most of the track would be on the modules anyways, (...) (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)

10 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR