Subject:
|
Re: If we are changing the Moonbase standards then why not...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Sep 2003 21:58:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
334 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Mike Petrucelli wrote:
| |
Ok the 8 high corridors has been my biggest “problem” with the moonbase
standard. I am definately in favor of making them higher, if nothing else so
larger things can roll under the corridors. I would like to ask why 10 high
though? Why not just go straight to 12 high corridors. (With corridors at 24,
36, 48, etc. for the vertical standard.) The obvious benefit would be that we
could build 2 floors to every corridor. With the current and proposed
standards we can only build “high ceiling” floors. If every thing were
multiples of 12 that would allow 2 normal floors or one “high ceiling” floor.
It just seems far more versatile to do it this way to me, especially given
the LEGO company’s fixation with even multiples. (ie. 48x48 grey plate versus
50x50) So what does everyone else think?
|
I guess I’m missing the point. How would this be easier to deal with than 10
high corridors (and subsequent floors at 10, 20, 30, etc)? I get the part about
larger things underneath, but that’s it. Something else to it?
-Chris
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | If we are changing the Moonbase standards then why not...
|
| Ok the 8 high corridors has been my biggest "problem" with the moonbase standard. I am definately in favor of making them higher, if nothing else so larger things can roll under the corridors. I would like to ask why 10 high though? Why not just go (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
