Subject:
|
Re: If we are changing the Moonbase standards then why not...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Sep 2003 22:40:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
467 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Mike Petrucelli wrote:
| |
In lugnet.space, Chris Maddison wrote:
|
| |
| |
I guess I’m missing the point. How would this be easier to deal with than
10 high corridors (and subsequent floors at 10, 20, 30, etc)? I get the
part about larger things underneath, but that’s it. Something else to it?
|
Sorry I wasn’t more clear. 10 high corridors would allow a module to have
only one tall (internally 8 high) floor for every corridor level. 12 high
corridors would allow a module to have two normal (internally 5 high) floors
for every corridor level. I hope that makes more sense.
-Mike Petrucelli
|
Mike,
I think I see what you are getting at, but I think you are mistaken. You are
refering to Minifigs required 5 bricks height for clearance, right? But if we
raise the corridor height (that means the corridor floor) to 10 bricks high,
that would allow for two floors below the corridor level AND the corridor level.
You are only going to lose a single plate height of headroom on one level. That
should still be enough clearance, yes?
Aaron S
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
