To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 27150
27149  |  27151
Subject: 
Re: What I Think May Be Correct (Was Re: (not quite) Looking at Mars)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Sat, 16 Aug 2003 17:04:55 GMT
Viewed: 
369 times
  
In lugnet.space, Dan Mattia wrote:
   I don’t know about the movements of the telescope, but about the lenses. If the lenses are similar to a microscope’s (I’ve learned about microscopes last year in school, which was torture, but I did good), the higher the number, the more magnified. If the base lens is say, 10, and the objectives are 100, you multiply 10*100 to get 1000X magnifiction.

Dan, Oh...duh...here’s your reply!!! 8>) I should have read the whole thread first. I’m not sure if it works that way or not, but maybe I’ll spend some time this weekend playing around with it to see if it’s the same as microscope lenses. I’m not sure what you mean by ‘objectives of 100’, though...would that be the front (immobile) lens of the telescope, the 50mm one? Thanks for your reply!

Peace and Long Life, Tony



Message is in Reply To:
  What I Think May Be Correct (Was Re: (not quite) Looking at Mars)
 
(...) -snip (...) I don't have an answer here. I hardly use telescopes; I've used my father's once or twice, but it's on a stand. (...) I don't know about the movements of the telescope, but about the lenses. If the lenses are similar to a (...) (21 years ago, 16-Aug-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)

14 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR