To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 27141
27140  |  27142
Subject: 
Re: (not quite) Looking at Mars
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Sat, 16 Aug 2003 10:52:40 GMT
Viewed: 
390 times
  
In lugnet.space, Tony Alexander wrote:
   Greetings, fellow .Spacers! A few years ago I went to Target and bought a little telescope from the toy section: a Discovery Channel telescope, 300 power, 50 mm; I forget the actual manufacturer’s name, but it was a real telescope company, and this was their lower-end introductory version. It came with a 3x Barlow lens, a little right-angle doohickey, and 3 lenses: h20mm, h12.5mm, and f6 mm. And instructions, but it’s been several years, so God only knows where those went. Buying another isn’t an option for me; I can barely afford to feed my Lego hobby when I’m lucky. I can look at the moon, and she’s beautiful. But I SUCK at trying to bring in anything smaller than that. I can almost get it in sight, but it’s a manual, old-fashioned telescope, and I might not have the gentle touch needed to really focus and point the thing. One day, but not soon enough to see this; I need to pay the bills first. Do any of you know anything about telescopes? I’d like to ask for your suggestions on how to see Mars, which I verified is what I’m seeing out there with two different programs (the excellent freeware Skyview 3.0, 1993-94, by Steven Michael Schimpf; and the Astronomy CD from Science Advantage 2000, by Encore Education, with programming published by Dorling Kindersley). * First, how the heck do you aim one of these things accurately at a little dot in the sky and keep it still long enough to see anything? * When I use the different lenses, I think that the lower the number the higher the magnification. Is this right, or is it the other way around? I wear glasses; should I take them off to focus an image in? Are the focus settings similar for each different lens, or will I need to exend the lens tube farther and farther for each lens? Should I move the actual telescope tube itself, and refrain from touching the lens tube? * Do I need a special camera adapter to take pictures of any images I’m lucky enough to get? I understand that the images are upside down and flip-flopped, but believe that to be correctable with image-editing software (or a very expensive (IMHO) correcting lens. Please share your experiences and advice with this poor lost skywatching soul. Any help you can provide will be much appreciated. Thanks!!!

Peace and Long Life, Tony Alexander CEO, Tw0nCo Enterprises & VERY amateur astronomer wannabe

I have some reply, but I don’t think it’ll be entirely correct. Let me know if you want me to spill my brains all over and speak it, or just to sit back and play Earth and Beyond again.

-Dan



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: (not quite) Looking at Mars
 
(...) SNIP (...) SNIP again (...) Please do, I'm sure others (me!) would like some advise as well! -Rob. (21 years ago, 16-Aug-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
  Re: (not quite) Looking at Mars
 
(...) Dan, Please do share! But not if your brains need to leak to do it. 8>) I'm interested in any advice you might have. Thanks! Peace and Long Life, Tony (21 years ago, 16-Aug-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  (not quite) Looking at Mars
 
Greetings, fellow .Spacers! A few years ago I went to Target and bought a little telescope from the toy section: a Discovery Channel telescope, 300 power, 50 mm; I forget the actual manufacturer's name, but it was a real telescope company, and this (...) (21 years ago, 16-Aug-03, to lugnet.space)

14 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR