Subject:
|
The Word on Fleebnorks
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 21:28:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
989 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Leonard Hoffman writes:
> <snip>
>
> > Despite the fact that I actually got it right, why should the color really
> > matter? Are Fleebnorks really homogenous? Humans aren't all pink, after all.
>
> THANK YOU!!
> My problem is that the original description of fleebnorks (parasites that
> infect power units on starships) kinda implies that they are really common.
That was my original intent.
It has been through the efforts of other .space folks that the common fleebnork
has become more than was originally intended. That's fine, I'm glad people are
having fun with the little critters.
As for color, you can do what you want, because I'm not going to waste my time
being the fleeb police.
IMO, fleebs are only trans neon green, and that is the only way you will see
them in any of my photos. You can do what you like, and have fun.
Cheers,
~Grand Admiral
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The Word on Fleebnorks
|
| (...) Call for new acronym: IMU - In My (Lego) Universe. It would fit perfectly in here. Allister A.R.U.* *Acronyms 'R' Us (21 years ago, 25-Feb-03, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
