Subject:
|
Re: How would you move a planet?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Wed, 19 Feb 2003 04:35:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
795 times
|
| |
|
|
"Jon Palmer" <jon@zemi.net> wrote in message news:HABBIM.81H@lugnet.com...
> Unlike my earlier post about the cables and reels, this does not directly
> have anything to do with an upcoming MOC, but I thought it would be a fun
> discussion nonetheless...
The William Randolph Hearst Method:
Take it apart piece by piece and put it back together where you want it.
The Relativity Method:
Leave the planet where it is. Move the rest of the Universe.
The Star Trek method:
Generate a static warp field around the planet, thus lowering its mass
to the point where it can be tractored away (or something like that--I
forget the particular episode).
The Hitch Hiker's Guide method:
Simply wait. Though highly improbable, it's not impossible that the
planet could simply disappear and reapear where you want it.
The Back to the Future Method:
Go back in time, manipulate a few particles here and there (maybe step
on a butterfly while you're at it), then come back.
The Off-Campus Apartment Method:
Park it in a reserved parking spot. It'll be towed within 10 minutes
without fail.
Okay, I think I've exhausted my supply of planet moving theories. But you
were right, this was fun! ;)
-- Tom
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | How would you move a planet?
|
| Unlike my earlier post about the cables and reels, this does not directly have anything to do with an upcoming MOC, but I thought it would be a fun discussion nonetheless. Now moving a giant body from one place to another is obviously a sci fi (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.space)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
