Subject:
|
Re: Microfig Creations and Karim Nassar's Pallas Spaceworks
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Apr 2000 20:02:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1616 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Jeremy H. Sproat writes:
<snip>
> I disagree. Detail doesn't necessarily entail a 1500-button command • display
> on the bridge. Effectiveness doesn't necessarily require a large scale.
I didn't say that effectiveness required a large scale... just fine detail.
> Part
> of the lure of microfig-scale building is trying to capture the essense of
> something in as few pieces as possible. (1) But it's not just the • challenge
> of minimalist design. It's also learning new and innovative ways to use
> pieces that would have never come up with minifig-scale building.
</snip>
Indeed, and by definition, "minimalist" means that it has less detail.
But I'm just nitpicking the definition of the word "detail" anyway.
Happy building.
~Mark
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Microfig Creations and Karim Nassar's Pallas Spaceworks
|
| (...) I disagree. Detail doesn't necessarily entail a 1500-button command display on the bridge. Effectiveness doesn't necessarily require a large scale. Part of the lure of microfig-scale building is trying to capture the essense of something in as (...) (24 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.space)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
