Subject:
|
Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter..
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sat, 9 Mar 2002 03:20:38 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
447 times
|
| |
| |
In article <GsJDou.2EK@lugnet.com>,
"Travis Matheson" <trav@centercom.com.au> wrote:
> She asked him what Lego Set he wanted, He wanted one that had sold
> out (I suspect that I may have just brought the last ATST the day
> before) so she asked him to pick another one. He was there for 10
> minutes, lookinmg at all the other sets, Mostly Jack Stone, Bonical
> and Creator. He turned to his mum and said "I don't like any of
> these sets, they are too simple"
And this is the information that TLC seems to be ignoring. When the very
children they're targeting think the sets are too simple, the designers
are definitely moving in the wrong direction. Ultimately, after all,
what kids like that want is more important to TLC than what we AFOLs
want.
--
Mark D. McKean - The Quantum Panda - qpanda@quantumpanda.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter..
|
| (...) I have to say that I pretty much agree with most everything you have said. I thought that the Bonical stuff, though interesting, really wasn't LEGO in the traditional sense, Jack Stone is an abonimation. I was never ever going to pay that much (...) (23 years ago, 6-Mar-02, to lugnet.space)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|