To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 13257
13256  |  13258
Subject: 
Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter..
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Sat, 9 Mar 2002 03:20:38 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
447 times
  
In article <GsJDou.2EK@lugnet.com>,
"Travis Matheson" <trav@centercom.com.au> wrote:

She asked him what Lego Set he wanted, He wanted one that had sold
out (I suspect that I may have just brought the last ATST the day
before) so she asked him to pick another one.  He was there for 10
minutes, lookinmg at all the other sets, Mostly Jack Stone, Bonical
and Creator.  He turned to his mum and said "I don't like any of
these sets, they are too simple"

And this is the information that TLC seems to be ignoring. When the very
children they're targeting think the sets are too simple, the designers
are definitely moving in the wrong direction. Ultimately, after all,
what kids like that want is more important to TLC than what we AFOLs
want.

--
Mark D. McKean - The Quantum Panda - qpanda@quantumpanda.com



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter..
 
(...) I have to say that I pretty much agree with most everything you have said. I thought that the Bonical stuff, though interesting, really wasn't LEGO in the traditional sense, Jack Stone is an abonimation. I was never ever going to pay that much (...) (23 years ago, 6-Mar-02, to lugnet.space)

12 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR