 | | Re: more .space Crash Course ideas
|
|
Here is a prototype docking port airlock passageway I created for the moonbase modules: (URL) main feature is its ability to function as a passageway between modules when the airlock is not needed. It is intended for semi-permanent connection (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Ex-lurker + Advertisement
|
|
(...) Hey Andrew! Just wanted to welcome you in from delurking! (Although between the Spraw adventure and planning the full Starship RPG, messages from you seem all too familiar to me to think of you as a lurker.) :-] Keep up the good work! -Hendo (22 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.gaming)
|
| |
| | Re: Some great Space info and dicussion
|
|
(...) Holy Moly! You sure know your physics! :) I would add though, that if the attacker in this scenario were concerned with "expenditure of resources" then they would be very unwise to ever consider killing a planet known to harbor life. Let's for (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Some great Space info and dicussion
|
|
(...) *When great distances are involved*, Yes, and this is precisely why there would be a place for carrier ships in SF space warfare. Although who ever said anything about cubical fuel tanks? Liquid and solid fuels are quite low-tech for some (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: A few new bots... and a bit more
|
|
(...) I'm not sure what's happening here, but it looks like serious sh**, especially the last shot. Surely Chewie's not gonna be killed off AGAIN!? ;^) (...) Ooo. That's a lot o' style in a little ship, from the sculpted nose, to the splayed (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Some great Space info and dicussion
|
|
Hi Jordan, If I may respond to a few of your comments... (...) I believe this to be true in modern day fleets. I am sure fuel and energy usage are calculated into a mission. (...) If you take a look at the history of technology, it is filled with (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: AT-FT - All Terrain Field Transport
|
|
(...) Very nice. Very Star Warsian. It looks like it's ready to pounce, although I'm not sure I'd like to be a passenger when it does :^) I like the detailing of the cockpit very much, although the positioning of it is perhaps a little bit too (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: Ex-lurker + Advertisement
|
|
(...) I like your site. It's nice to see a Lego page with an actual backstory, there aren't enough of those. The Errant Kangaroo is an interesting looking ship, though personally I would have liked it more if it were built to a larger scale. Anyhow, (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.gaming)
|
| |
| | Re: Some great Space info and dicussion
|
|
(...) The utility of a fighter craft in space is inversely proportional to the cost of energy, and magnitude of distances and velocities involved in space combat, and directly proportional to the acceleration rates of which your fighter craft are (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Some great Space info and dicussion
|
|
Ahh, but that assumes you have the technology. His theory is that you (...) also (...) Unless acceleration is almost instantaneous, the waste energy of whatever accelerates the rock to light speed will reach you long before the rock does. Assuming (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
