Subject:
|
Re: pbFORTH needs better uploading, docs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 Jan 2000 18:44:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1240 times
|
| |
|
|
In response to a message by Ben Jackson, Ralph Hempel wrote:
<snip>
> Later on in your note, you say caveat emptor.
Actually Ralph, I think that was me. :)
Although there are a few things *I've* said about pbforth that I don't
like, you've given your reasons for the choices you've made to a level
that satisfies even me. Although I still cannot say I agree with your
rationale, I would have to say that I still respect it. If for no other
reason than the fact that I respect the work you have put into pbForth
so far.
In the interim, I plan on waiting patiently for an upcoming release
which does not rely on the rcx to do the compiling.
Keep up the good work!
> > Mark
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | RE: pbFORTH needs better uploading, docs
|
| (...) I realized this later, and felt it would be even more confusing to clear it up! Mea Culpa again! (...) Great. I've been struggling with getting info for the FAQ together that makes it easy for all platforms to use pbForth. The goofy line-end (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | RE: pbFORTH needs better uploading, docs
|
| Ben, Thanks for emailing and feeding back some important issues for the rest of the Mindstorms pbForth community. I'll always welcome comments and respond as quickly as possible... Let me address each point, sorry about the quoting, but it's needed (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
