To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforthOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / pbFORTH / *333 (-20)
  proposed new word for deleting pbforth
 
It would be handy if there was a word that deleted firmware. It is often inconvenient to get at the batteries. At Kekoa I see the opcode but no rom entry point. Trashing the header in memory and jumping to the reset vector might do it. I wonder if (...) (24 years ago, 16-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
 
  RE: More linux feedback. firmware upload doesn't work for me.
 
(...) This is wierd. I had it working on my Caldera Linux 2.2 which has TclTk 8.0.4 I'll try again. One of the problems is that I can't seem to get a nice NFS system running here, and I have to FTP the files around... :-( I'll try and make a better (...) (24 years ago, 16-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  More linux feedback. firmware upload doesn't work for me.
 
Firmware download is not working. I'm sorry but I never tried this with the first release. A second problem is that it gives no error message if the firmware download fails. I got suspicious because the download was too fast and the LCD was not (...) (24 years ago, 16-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  Re: New pbForth GUI; linux feedback
 
(...) o - When will 1.2.0 sources be available? I'd rather be working from current stuff. Does the gui depend on this version of pbforth? o - rcxtk.tcl should have executable permission in the tarball. This can be done with the -p flag to tar (...) (24 years ago, 16-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  New pbForth GUI
 
You are receiving this email because you are on the pbForth mailing list. If you wish to be removed, click on the following link: <mailto:rhempel@bmts...subscribe> I'd like to announce the availability of an early trial version of a GUI for pbForth. (...) (24 years ago, 16-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  Re: serial port interrupts
 
(...) I'm not suggesting that it isn't hard. Compared to native debugging with printf and gdb in an emacs window it is quite hard. It's just that you build up a bag of tricks after a while or take up application development instead. :-) One of the (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  RE: serial port interrupts
 
(...) It's amazing, but I get all kinds of comments on how it's impossible to debug systems like the RCX brick. I guess if you're used to deeply embedded systems, figuring out how to let it tell you what's going on is a big part of the magic... (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  Re: serial port interrupts
 
(...) Actually that's what I was intending but I couldn't remember the words at my keyboard. To make debugging easier I will use parallel words that can be merged in later. I was going to use the following debugging strategy: Put the isr init in a (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  RE: serial port interrupts
 
(...) Sounds good Steve, see notes below for some pointers... (...) Absolutely. All we have to do is enable the interrupts on the receiver throw the chars into a buffer. I'd keep the standard FORTH words that already exist so less system source (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  serial port interrupts
 
Ralph, I'm getting tired of losing characters going to the RCX on the serial port because forth is busy. It is making my work more complex than it needs to be. If you are not going to do serial port interrupts I will take a shot at it if you give me (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  RE: Factor upload script for user extensions
 
(...) Ummm, great idea. How about an item that turns into a pulldown list of 1-liners? I've got the X close or AltF4 shell closing capture thing, and I've also got XMODEM working. If I can get enough time, a public beta is in order... Cheers, Ralph (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  Factor upload script for user extensions
 
Ralph, I suggest that you factor a proceedure out of the tcl uploadScript that sends a string to the RCX. This could then be used for additional menu or tcl commands that send Forth code to the RCX. Here is a potential implementation used to power (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  RE: Standard extension suggestions
 
Glen Paling Wrote: (...) Snipped code samples... Glen, These are really a good example of how the community can help itself. How does everyone feel about a code repository? How should it be implemented? Where should it live? I'm reluctant to have (...) (24 years ago, 12-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  Re: Standard extension suggestions
 
I think that's a great idea. I find example code the easiest way for me to learn. The pbForth can be little intimidating at first, (you can't even turn off the power with the on-off button). Earlier last fall Sergey Udovenko posted some code handle (...) (24 years ago, 12-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  Getting started
 
(...) Hmm... Which OS are you using? Configuring the terminal window is easy once you know the magic incantation 2400 baud, no parity, 1 stop bit, no handshaking. Ralph forgot to document that so you have to learn it from this or several other posts (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  Re: Standard extension suggestions
 
(...) >Let me describe how I program on the RCX and it (...) Actually, it's this first bit that I find intimidating...the forth part sounds fun. Jeff jeffrey.hazen@northmill.net (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  Re: Standard extension suggestions
 
(...) It is hard for me to tell. It is not hard for me but I am a programmer with many years under his belt. However forth seems idealy suited for someone getting started. It is a very interactive environment which encourages experimentation. Let me (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  RE: Standard extension suggestions
 
I think this would be a good idea, even if they never incorporated into the "official" kernel. Sort of a code repository similar to what has been proposed for NQC. That said, the thing that intimidates me is my lack of any experience with the (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  Standard extension suggestions
 
I suggest that we collectively create a standard extension package that makes life a little simpler for beginners or maybe for developers in general. I have already started what I would use but it occured to me that this might be of general value. (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  POWER_OFF serial port interaction
 
The following word has unexpected behavior: : off ." off" CR CR POWER_OFF ." on" CR ; I see the output when it turns off. when I turn it on I see nothing on the serial port. It finally appears when I type anything at the terminal. The character I (...) (24 years ago, 6-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR