 | | RE: Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs
|
|
(...) Hi :) (...) Heheh, my feelings exactly before "bumping" into LUGnet community almost a year and a half ago ;) Ok, now, about the way I use Timer() and will try to use FastTimer() or counter loop if proven more effective. I have no need to get (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs
|
|
Hi Dean, thanks for your interesting idea for a reduction of transmission time. I will deal with that as soon as possible. Your questions: (...) Version 2.0 (...) No. Do you think that is faster? (...) No, just the transmission program. (...) Good (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs
|
|
Hi Marco, it is always interesting how many other people in the world do have the same problems or are dealing with the same subject. Sometimes I had the feeling that I dealt with "exotic" problems but then I realized that other "Mindstormers" had (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs
|
|
Hi Bernd :) I see we're working in the same subject here :) *great* If you care to browse lugnet.robotics old thread "VLL *input* for RCX/CyberMaster (in NQC) ?" or the newer one, starting with "CM-RCX" (the subject had some variations) Your (...) (24 years ago, 27-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs
|
|
Thanks for the info on the electric datalink. It's a clever idea that I never would have thought of myself. It seems to me that you could cut down on your transmission time if you changed the shape of your pulse train. The pauses between bits don't (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs
|
|
I am not positive about this, but some of the jitter may be due to the mode in which the motor outputs work. They are PWM at 125 Hz, so I am wondering if, when the byte code to change an output setting is executed, the new state setting is placed (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs
|
|
Hi Bernd, When you need it really fast, you sholud use legOS instead of NQC. A program written with NQC uses the LEGO firmware, which is a ByteCode Interpreter. This pogram is interpreted Byte after Byte from firmaware. The firmware executes the (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: sending variables betwen rcx's?
|
|
Hi Adam, if I understand your problem correctly, you want to transmit a sensor value from one RCX to another RCX which will work with that value. Now, if the 2 RCXs can "see" each other than simply use the Message statement. If not, you should take (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs
|
|
It's me again with the subject "electrical datalink between 2 RCXs" (I posted some articles a couple of weeks ago). This subject may seem trivial but in fact it is not. Dealing with it, I discovered some "unpleasanties" in the general execution of (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | New Version of MacNQC
|
|
Hello, I have just released the final version of MacNQC 2.2. This release incorporates the latest (2.2 r2) version of the NQC compiler. Find and replace were added. An Auto indent mode in the editor was added. New RCX test and control panels were (...) (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQCEdit
|
|
Dear two, I like your program very much. I have three suggestions: 1. Give a progress indication when downloading or uploading, if possible. 2. Identify unsaved changes by an asterisk behind the filename in the titlebar. 3. Allow to copy from the (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Event monitoring
|
|
(...) You can generate a message internally with InternalMessage(X); but X must be a constant (can't be a variable). I'm not sure if this will trigger the message event - I haven't tried it myself. If it does trigger an event, you could use the (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Event monitoring
|
|
Hi all, I have just switched to NQC 2.3 b1 (from 2.2) to implement the new features of the RCX 2.0. I have used event monitoring to clean up my if/else statements that control outputs. This works fine with all legal event sources, but I use allot of (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: sending variables betwen rcx's?
|
|
Hey, wow. did'nt know some of that. (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: sending variables betwen rcx's?
|
|
My advice would be to try and solve the problem using the regular message facilities (SendMessage(), ClearMessage(), Message()). If you have more than 255 values to convey between the RCX's, then you can try chaining multiple messages together (with (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: sending variables betwen rcx's?
|
|
Mechanical responce to light stimuli, involving motor ports from the RCX to controll levers ,switches or other motion components. A series of Send and Recive, & Wait times, allow Comand stacks from the sensor watchers to to activate these devices. (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | sending variables betwen rcx's?
|
|
to all i am currently working on a robot with 2 rcx due to the number of sensors i have on the robot. my current problem is that i have 2 light sensor which is conected to seperate rcx. one of the rcx with light sensor is calibrated using some (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | New version of NQCEdit
|
|
The new version is downloadable from (URL) (later this week also from (URL) ) Thanks to all beta testers, especially Mario Ferrari for his load of input to us. What's New?? Improvements in version 1.1 ---...--- * The user can select if the source (...) (24 years ago, 11-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX2 info
|
|
You will never see a/c socket in the 2.0 brick, because it has been released in Japan. Zhengrong (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX2 info
|
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ahui Herrera" <jedi_agh@yahoo.com> To: <lugnet.robotics.rcx...ugnet.com> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 6:09 AM Subject: Re: RCX2 info (...) This question has been answered by Juergen. (...) only (...) Have you seen (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
