 | | Re: NQCEdit
|
|
Dear two, I like your program very much. I have three suggestions: 1. Give a progress indication when downloading or uploading, if possible. 2. Identify unsaved changes by an asterisk behind the filename in the titlebar. 3. Allow to copy from the (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Event monitoring
|
|
(...) You can generate a message internally with InternalMessage(X); but X must be a constant (can't be a variable). I'm not sure if this will trigger the message event - I haven't tried it myself. If it does trigger an event, you could use the (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Event monitoring
|
|
Hi all, I have just switched to NQC 2.3 b1 (from 2.2) to implement the new features of the RCX 2.0. I have used event monitoring to clean up my if/else statements that control outputs. This works fine with all legal event sources, but I use allot of (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: sending variables betwen rcx's?
|
|
Hey, wow. did'nt know some of that. (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: sending variables betwen rcx's?
|
|
My advice would be to try and solve the problem using the regular message facilities (SendMessage(), ClearMessage(), Message()). If you have more than 255 values to convey between the RCX's, then you can try chaining multiple messages together (with (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: sending variables betwen rcx's?
|
|
Mechanical responce to light stimuli, involving motor ports from the RCX to controll levers ,switches or other motion components. A series of Send and Recive, & Wait times, allow Comand stacks from the sensor watchers to to activate these devices. (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | sending variables betwen rcx's?
|
|
to all i am currently working on a robot with 2 rcx due to the number of sensors i have on the robot. my current problem is that i have 2 light sensor which is conected to seperate rcx. one of the rcx with light sensor is calibrated using some (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | New version of NQCEdit
|
|
The new version is downloadable from (URL) (later this week also from (URL) ) Thanks to all beta testers, especially Mario Ferrari for his load of input to us. What's New?? Improvements in version 1.1 ---...--- * The user can select if the source (...) (24 years ago, 11-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX2 info
|
|
You will never see a/c socket in the 2.0 brick, because it has been released in Japan. Zhengrong (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX2 info
|
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ahui Herrera" <jedi_agh@yahoo.com> To: <lugnet.robotics.rcx...ugnet.com> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 6:09 AM Subject: Re: RCX2 info (...) This question has been answered by Juergen. (...) only (...) Have you seen (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX2 info
|
|
(...) Yes, get it here: (URL) Jürgen Stuber <stuber@loria.fr> (URL) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX2 info
|
|
Here are my 2 cents on your questions (...) RCX2 will be a new brick. You won't be able to buy it until the fall of this year. (...) I'm not sure if you can just download the new firmware into an RCX1. From what I've seen the physcial difference (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | RCX2 info
|
|
Hi, Can anybody inform me about RCX2? I want to know if: - RCX2 is an new Lego brick (another then RCX1.0)? If Yes, where can I buy it? - It is possible to upgrade RCX1 to RCX2 by loading new firmware? If Yes, where can I download tis firmware and (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Visual NQC 2001 Beta 3 release
|
|
Frans, Your story sounds very strange to me, but You should place NQC.exe in a directory like C:\NQC\NQC.exe (No spaces in the path!!) Change the path to NQC.exe by use of the preferences dialog. This must fix the runtime error. I will check the (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Beta testers wanted
|
|
Some of you already downloaded NQCEdit, but we have only got two people to report bugs. Thank to Mario Ferrari and Marc Buchner for the suggestions they reported. For futher development we need some input about whats missing, bugs and so on. So if (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Visual NQC 2001 Beta 3 release
|
|
Hello Ronald, Great that you took up the challenge to provide a successor to RxCC! I have a problem with using the program though. I've downloaded the english version last wednesday and it still gives the runtime error and help problems you describe (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQCEdit
|
|
And for all of you who tried the adress ericsson.just.nu (witch IS stated in the program) I'll just say: My brother can't spell his own lastname. the correct adress is (URL) the mirror site (URL) Eriksson (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQCEdit
|
|
"Mario Ferrari" <mario.ferrari@edis.it> wrote in message news:G9J3IL.2w5@lugnet.com... (...) anywhere (...) RcxCC, (...) at (...) To reply to the group what I wrote to Mario private: (...) /Martin Eriksson And for all of you who tried the adress (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQCEdit
|
|
"Matthias Jetleb" <jetleb@netcom.ca> write: (...) Hi Matthias, yes I agree this is a good thing, if you want and know that it happens. Actually most IDEs allow you to enable/disable the save-before-compile option (that's usually disabled by (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQCEdit
|
|
(...) Actually, this is a GOOD thing. I've never seen a compiler that doesn't save the source first. Compilers can occasionally do wierd and not-so-wonderful things which may include full or partial system crashes. Given this possibility, you WANT (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
