 | | Program() always returns 0
|
|
The following code always displays 0 regardless of the program slot in which it is run. Is this a bug, or do I not understand the purpose of Program()? I'm using the 2.0 firmware and NQC 2.4 r2. task main() { SetUserDisplay(Program(),0); (...) (23 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC and BricxCC problem
|
|
John, The crash is because NQC is trying to print out an error message but doesn't have legitimate information about the lexical location (file, line number, etc) of where the error occurred. The error itself is from the "#pragma init" line - (...) (23 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | NQC and BricxCC problem
|
|
Dave (or anyone else who might have an idea), I'm trying to figure out a problem that a user reported regarding BricxCC and its interaction with NQC. (I've only tested it against the latest release of both BricxCC and NQC.) When attempting to (...) (23 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Small bug in Bricxcc 3.3.4.5
|
|
hi John, thanks for the fast respons. After some invetsigation, I came to the conclusion that you are right, but I'm also right. (...) Yes this seems to work. But I'm not such a perfect programmer as you ;-) Now try to introduce an error and compile (...) (23 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Small bug in Bricxcc 3.3.4.5
|
|
(...) I'm trying to duplicate what you describe and I'm unable to do so (in version 3.3.4.5). I started a new file. Pressed F9. Clicked on a template containing a "field". The template was inserted into the editor and the first (or only) field was (...) (23 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Small bug in Bricxcc 3.3.4.5
|
|
hi John, I think there's a small bug in BricxCC version 3.3.4.5 (and also in some previous versions). When you insert a template it's not possible to type directly into the "fields". Instead you've to move the cursor 1 line up and then go with F10 (...) (23 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: MacNQC - iBook with USB tower
|
|
Hi Jenny and all other Mac users, I 've got no problems with my PowerBook G3/400 and the usb tower running MacNQC 3.0a4. I don't know if anyone must know that my Mac works with MacOS 9.2.2. I installed the driver and the four additional 4 ghost (...) (23 years ago, 15-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | MacNQC - iBook with USB tower
|
|
I'm using an iBook running MacOS 9.1 I've installed MacNQC 3.0a4. It worked fine with a serial tower prior to installing the USB drivers. I installed the USB drivers and placed the cooresponding files in the extensions folder. I restarted the system (...) (23 years ago, 15-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | BricxCC release 3.3.4.5
|
|
I've released another version of BricxCC. This release fixes a couple minor bugs. The Code Explorer feature wasn't processing a file when it was first opened (it was waiting until the first change was made). That should work correctly in this (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Error Message
|
|
(...) I don't know if you are using BricxCC or not, but I get a single error when I try to compile this line of code if the target is set to Scout or Cybermaster. If I turn on the NQC 1.x compatibility mode via the Preferences dialog I get two (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Error Message
|
|
The only thing I could think of is if NQC thinks you are generating code for some other device (e.g. CyberMaster). Try adding -Trcx2 to the command line to force NQC to target RCX2. If that doesn't fix it, email me the program and I'll take a look. (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Robot Controller 1.5
|
|
I have released a new (beta) version of Robot Controller, the ideal companion to NQC for Mac OS X. This version adds support for serial IR towers (provided you have a working serial port) and makes several other minor improvements. Download it now (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Need help with NQC
|
|
"Russell Newman" <victoreden@netzero.net> wrote in message news:GtLuCA.38p@lugnet.com... (...) RCX (...) In what way is it misbehaving? When backing up, it only backs up for 3/4 of a second. Is that enough? When turning, it only turns for a maximum (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Error Message
|
|
Hi. Can anyone help me with a problem I'm having. I'm writing a fairly simple program in NQC and when I compile I get an error saying "undefined variable SENSOR_LIGHT" The line that generates this error is simply: SetSensor(SENSOR_1, SENSOR_LIGHT); (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: lego turing machine
|
|
(...) I got to thinking, maybe this isn't so impossible after all. Imagine if you used 2x2 blocks with 2x2 tiles on top. Now you have something the RCX can lift. Run two pieces of train track parallel to each other, with four spots' width separating (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: lego turing machine
|
|
Hi JDF, Thanks for the feedback. I know it's not a Turing machine in the true sense, but let me tell you what I'm trying to do. At the moment I realize that I have built a sort of binary adder. But what I am currently implementing is a change in (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: lego turing machine
|
|
(...) An interesting idea, but the pedant and geek in me has to note that this isn't a Turing machine. Even ignoring Turing's original idea that the tape is infinite, the problem is that the Turing machine placed its output back on the tape. It (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: lego turing machine
|
|
murphy's law at its best: due to bandwith problems, my server has cut off my page. it now 1:30 am., and i've finally got a mirror up on an old yahoo account. it should do fine. looks like 0catch.com had a very big catch. www.geocities.com/aatishb/ (...) (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: lego turing machine
|
|
I umm.. forgot to post the site along with the message. sorry. (smiling sheepishly) (URL) Bhatia" <aatish@mac.com> wrote in message news:Gtp1qJ.801@lugnet.com... (...) pics (...) technically (...) and (...) code (...) minimalistic, (...) (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | turing machine follow up
|
|
I umm.. forgot to post the site along with the message. sorry. (smiling sheepishly) (URL) (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
