To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legosOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / legOS / 2636
2635  |  2637
Subject: 
Re: Scheduler patch
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
Date: 
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 15:20:12 GMT
Viewed: 
1990 times
  
Well, actually not :)

If users don't want proportional timeslicing the patch is completly useless,
but if they do, it might be usefull.

/Joel


Do you have some examples where your patch could be useful?

Eric



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Scheduler patch
 
I have found that using proportional timeslicing works great in many situations. It is more forgiving for new developers, since a "runaway" process will not block processes of lower priority. (runaway process used here to mean a process which never (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Scheduler patch
 
(...) Do you have some examples where your patch could be useful? Eric (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

17 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR