Subject:
|
Re: threads - bug in the firmware?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:49:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1750 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi Ross
> Note also since bumper_task() is an infinite loop, and you never use pid1, • you
> could save one thread by doing this:
What are the advantages and disadvantages of
this method as opposed to the one I used?
mike
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: threads - bug in the firmware?
|
| (...) Advantage: Less memory used (each thread needs a block of memory in the kernel, I'm at work & can't remember the struct name off hand). In the case under discussion, this doesn't make much difference, but in a large project, memory use can (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: threads - bug in the firmware?
|
| (...) Note also since bumper_task() is an infinite loop, and you never use pid1, you could save one thread by doing this: int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { pid2 = execi (&left_task, 0, NULL, PRIO_NORMAL+2, DEFAULT_STACK_SIZE); pid3 = execi (...) (22 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
