|
Kekoa Proudfoot wrote:
> The first instruction (at 03ae) places the stack in on-chip memory,
> assuming RAME bit of SYSCR is at its initial value of 1.
>
> Why not make rom_reset() disable interrupts, then do its thing? That would
> be the safest thing to do.
That's what I am doing.
Markus.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: loading s/w
|
| (...) The first instruction (at 03ae) places the stack in on-chip memory, assuming RAME bit of SYSCR is at its initial value of 1. Why not make rom_reset() disable interrupts, then do its thing? That would be the safest thing to do. -Kekoa (25 years ago, 21-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
11 Messages in This Thread: ![loading s/w -Vic Mulyk (8-Apr-99 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: loading s/w -Richard Franks (8-Apr-99 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: loading s/w -Kekoa Proudfoot (8-Apr-99 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: loading s/w -Kekoa Proudfoot (8-Apr-99 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: loading s/w -Richard Franks (9-Apr-99 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: loading s/w -Markus L. Noga (20-Apr-99 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: loading s/w -Lou Sortman (20-Apr-99 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: loading s/w -Markus L. Noga (20-Apr-99 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: loading s/w -Kekoa Proudfoot (21-Apr-99 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: loading s/w -Luis Villa (21-Apr-99 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|