 | | Re: Help with make in Windows
|
|
Gary- Unfortunately, I believe that Rossz's tools are known not to work with NT/w2k. The problem is with the DJGPP toolset itself, not with Rossz's work. If installing on win95/98 is not an option, you may want to take a look at (URL) are (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP ActiveX for windows users
|
|
(...) can (...) Oh yes, I'm using GNU tools for windows. Now (for a couple of days I was busy in a HW upgrade for my system), I'm working to make lnpd works on Win32 (client lib part already quite OK, server part need to be tuned-up). Code already (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Help with make in Windows
|
|
I have LegOS 0.2.3 installed and, thanks to instructions by Rossz Vamos-Wentworth I've gotten quite far down the path of getting the software to work. The firmware works fine and I can upload a demo .lx and have it work fine. However, I can't get (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP ActiveX for windows users
|
|
Thank you very much! It will be thoroughly tested this tuesday. It was exactly what was needed to get our project running smoothly again. Up until now, I was worried that we'd have to switch platforms in midproject. Torkel Yannis Jeannotat (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP ActiveX for windows users
|
|
(...) Yannis, if space is a problem for pre-compiled tools, my task for Monday is the re-organization of the legOS archives at legOS.sourceforge.net. You are certainly welcome to get space and access there if you want. (...) Paolo, if that is in (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP ActiveX for windows users
|
|
Yannis- That's great! To be honest, I've never written a single line of code for Windows, so I can't be certain, but it looks very nicely organized and pretty straightforward in its interface. I'm sure someone will find a use for it, even if the (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP ActiveX for windows users
|
|
(...) that (...) Great job! But, please, give us a pre-compiled version of .dll too... VC++ is not a free compiler... ;-) I was working to a lnpd porting to Win32 (quite finished indeed), but I can stop if your version is already finished and (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | LNP ActiveX for windows users
|
|
Hello, I spent some time working on an ActiveX for LNP communication and I think that may be of interest for some of the users of this group. You can find the sources at (URL) send me all your comments. Thanks, Yannis (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: SDL and legOS (was: memory left)
|
|
Luis Villa <liv@duke.edu> wrote in message news:960488287.393fe...uke.edu... (...) productive, (...) Well, it depends of course on what you intend to do with it. If you for example design and implement a protocol of some sort, it's a great (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | two questions
|
|
Hey, everybody. I have two questions, most of which probably can't be understood by most of the readers on this list :( 1) Is there any way that the stack size might be miscalculated by the new, improved makelx? I've experienced a problem where a (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: lcd_refresh()- get rid of it?
|
|
Then I'll put a note in to that effect- can't believe I hadn't noticed that earlier. There are a couple of bugs in config.h, too (in the CONF_X depends on CONF_Y) sections, so I'll just check something in later. Nothing big, just irritating :) -Luis (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: lcd_refresh()- get rid of it?
|
|
"Luis Villa" <liv@duke.edu> wrote in message news:FvuEJE.F7I@lugnet.com... (...) Well, it depends on the line: #define CONF_LCD_REFRESH in file boot/config.h. If you comment it out, you still need lcd_refresh()... :-) Bye, Paolo. --- "The pessimist (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: SDL and legOS (was: memory left)
|
|
Quoting Torkel Niklasson <torkel.niklasson@te...ogic.com>: (...) That's what I gathered from the docs. Interesting- sounds much more productive, too, if perhaps a little limiting. (...) Great. What exactly do you mean by "adapt", by the way? Just (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | lcd_refresh()- get rid of it?
|
|
Hey, everyone (but I suppose Markus in particular, if he's still even out there anymore)- I've been playing with the LCD functions in the CVS legOS and, as far as I can tell, not a single one of the functions requires lcd_refresh() anyome. So far, (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | SDL and legOS (was: memory left)
|
|
Well, SDL is a very good programming language indeed. Its main attraction to me is that it draws your attention away from stupid little programming errors, such as memory allocation, pointers not pointing where they're supposed to point and (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: memory left
|
|
(...) This little program scans the memory list and prints the amount of free memory: Eddie C. Dost ecd@skynet.be -- #include <unistd.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <sys/tm.h> #include <sys/mm.h> #include <sys/irq.h> #include <conio.h> extern (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: memory left
|
|
I'm pretty much always interested in anything that anyone does with legOS.... makes me feel less lonely here ;) I've never heard of SDL before, but after looking through some of the docs, I'll admit it looks quite interesting. Please keep up us to (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: memory left
|
|
Thank you. The reason I'm asking is that we are doing our master's work/thesis on adapting the Telelogic (Swedish company) SDL tool to the legos platform. I guess the measurement of memory is not a critical part of this, unless there is none left, (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: memory left
|
|
Not to the best of my knowledge, but I'll take a look later this afternoon. If you need to create more memory, take a look at kernel/config.h, and start undefining features that you don't need. None of those will make a huge difference, but they are (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | memory left
|
|
Is there a way to check how much memory is still available on the RCX? Torkel (24 years ago, 7-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
