 | | Re: LNP ActiveX for windows users
|
|
Yannis- That's great! To be honest, I've never written a single line of code for Windows, so I can't be certain, but it looks very nicely organized and pretty straightforward in its interface. I'm sure someone will find a use for it, even if the (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP ActiveX for windows users
|
|
(...) that (...) Great job! But, please, give us a pre-compiled version of .dll too... VC++ is not a free compiler... ;-) I was working to a lnpd porting to Win32 (quite finished indeed), but I can stop if your version is already finished and (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | LNP ActiveX for windows users
|
|
Hello, I spent some time working on an ActiveX for LNP communication and I think that may be of interest for some of the users of this group. You can find the sources at (URL) send me all your comments. Thanks, Yannis (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: SDL and legOS (was: memory left)
|
|
Luis Villa <liv@duke.edu> wrote in message news:960488287.393fe...uke.edu... (...) productive, (...) Well, it depends of course on what you intend to do with it. If you for example design and implement a protocol of some sort, it's a great (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | two questions
|
|
Hey, everybody. I have two questions, most of which probably can't be understood by most of the readers on this list :( 1) Is there any way that the stack size might be miscalculated by the new, improved makelx? I've experienced a problem where a (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: lcd_refresh()- get rid of it?
|
|
Then I'll put a note in to that effect- can't believe I hadn't noticed that earlier. There are a couple of bugs in config.h, too (in the CONF_X depends on CONF_Y) sections, so I'll just check something in later. Nothing big, just irritating :) -Luis (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: lcd_refresh()- get rid of it?
|
|
"Luis Villa" <liv@duke.edu> wrote in message news:FvuEJE.F7I@lugnet.com... (...) Well, it depends on the line: #define CONF_LCD_REFRESH in file boot/config.h. If you comment it out, you still need lcd_refresh()... :-) Bye, Paolo. --- "The pessimist (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: SDL and legOS (was: memory left)
|
|
Quoting Torkel Niklasson <torkel.niklasson@te...ogic.com>: (...) That's what I gathered from the docs. Interesting- sounds much more productive, too, if perhaps a little limiting. (...) Great. What exactly do you mean by "adapt", by the way? Just (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | lcd_refresh()- get rid of it?
|
|
Hey, everyone (but I suppose Markus in particular, if he's still even out there anymore)- I've been playing with the LCD functions in the CVS legOS and, as far as I can tell, not a single one of the functions requires lcd_refresh() anyome. So far, (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | SDL and legOS (was: memory left)
|
|
Well, SDL is a very good programming language indeed. Its main attraction to me is that it draws your attention away from stupid little programming errors, such as memory allocation, pointers not pointing where they're supposed to point and (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: memory left
|
|
(...) This little program scans the memory list and prints the amount of free memory: Eddie C. Dost ecd@skynet.be -- #include <unistd.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <sys/tm.h> #include <sys/mm.h> #include <sys/irq.h> #include <conio.h> extern (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: memory left
|
|
I'm pretty much always interested in anything that anyone does with legOS.... makes me feel less lonely here ;) I've never heard of SDL before, but after looking through some of the docs, I'll admit it looks quite interesting. Please keep up us to (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: memory left
|
|
Thank you. The reason I'm asking is that we are doing our master's work/thesis on adapting the Telelogic (Swedish company) SDL tool to the legos platform. I guess the measurement of memory is not a critical part of this, unless there is none left, (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: memory left
|
|
Not to the best of my knowledge, but I'll take a look later this afternoon. If you need to create more memory, take a look at kernel/config.h, and start undefining features that you don't need. None of those will make a huge difference, but they are (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | memory left
|
|
Is there a way to check how much memory is still available on the RCX? Torkel (24 years ago, 7-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: where do I download lnpd+liblnp?
|
|
(...) ---...--- "Going to California with an aching in my heart. Someone told me there's a girl out there with love in her eyes and flowers in her hair." -Led Zeppelin, "Going to California" ---...--- (24 years ago, 6-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | where do I download lnpd+liblnp?
|
|
I can't seem to find anywhere to download the lnpd+liblnp tar ball. Does anyone know where it might be? Torkel (24 years ago, 6-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Power supply
|
|
(...) The 1.0 can accept a pretty standard DC convereter plug (look in the back). The 1.5 kits don't have this, the 2.0 kits will (supposedly.) I don't use this (which is dumb;) but many others have with good results. -Luis ---...--- "Going to (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Power supply
|
|
I'm sorry if this is off topic. I intend to have my legos program running for some considerable time on my rcx(1.0), and of course am worried about power consumption. Are there any upgrade kits I can get that allow for a dc power supply or perhaps (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: compiler question (second try)
|
|
In article (...) Building under LinuxPPC, I was able to get everything working with egcs 1.1.2. However, gcc 2.95 didn't work. I could get legOS.srec to build and download, it would work OK for turning the RCX on/off, but the first time I tried (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
