To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcxOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / 392
391  |  393
Subject: 
Re: OO programing in RCX
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx
Date: 
Thu, 13 Jan 2000 02:34:11 GMT
Viewed: 
1850 times
  
In article <387C8058.AF9FC49A@noga.de>, "Markus L. Noga" <markus@noga.de> wrote:

Dave Baum schrieb:

Also the preprocessor needed its own parser (for #if) which is fairly
simple recursive descent parser built by hand.  Expressions (for #if
directives) are parsed using a hand built operator precedence parser.
Neithr of these tasks were complicated enough to warrant creating another
bison generated LALR parser.

Prof. Goos rather convincingly advocates generation as the do-all and
cure-all here in Karlsruhe. Great maintainability, a supportive formal
framework and less code to write - and less code means less errors.

If I were writing NQC from scratch, I'd agree.  However, several years ago
I was writing a preprocessor and bison wasn't available to me, so I
hand-coded the parser.  When NQC was started, I just reused about 90% of
this parser.  Of coruse, along the way I had also put in the effort to
port Bison (and Flex) to CodeWarrior, so at this point using bison is more
practical.

Code generation is completely custom.  Optimization is done in the same • <snip>

I thought so, from the way NQC evolved. It was a one-pass compiler
initially, wasn't it? Did you already chose an intermediate
representation?


Yes, one pass.  Actually about 90% of the work was originally in the
preprocessor.

No, not yet.  I was concentrating on getting 2.1 final, then I was going
to look pretty heavily at code genereation.

Dave

--
reply to: dbaum at enteract dot com



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: OO programing in RCX
 
Dave Baum schrieb: (...) Yes, definitely so. Many concepts in parser generators are actually OO (bison result types, for example), but they aren't implemented that way. (...) Prof. Goos rather convincingly advocates generation as the do-all and (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)

14 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR