Subject:
|
Re: OO programing in RCX
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx
|
Date:
|
Mon, 10 Jan 2000 16:43:54 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.{spamcake}org
|
Viewed:
|
1511 times
|
| |
|
|
David Leeper <david.leeper@destiny.com> wrote:
> There always Visual Basic. I'm currently building a few ActiveX controls which
> sit on top of Spirit. So far its working nicely and is a big improvement over
> the non-class method of VB coding I used in my original prototype.
I'm curious -- are you making it so you can think about your RCX program in
OO terms, or just the VB program that sends opcodes?
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: OO programing in RCX
|
| Hi Mathew, There are no objects on the RCX, in the sense that there are no vtables on the RCX. I made no changes to spirit.ocx. But I definitely think of the RCX code in terms of objects now. There are "brain" objects, "map" objects, "identity" (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | Re: OO programing in RCX
|
| What I mean is to think the RCX in OO. For example, I can add a sensor object in my programming code when I plug a sensor into my RCX. I can make the sensor object to interface with the RCX object in the OO manner. Is that possible? I learned some (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: OO programing in RCX
|
| Hi Eric, There always Visual Basic. I'm currently building a few ActiveX controls which sit on top of Spirit. So far its working nicely and is a big improvement over the non-class method of VB coding I used in my original prototype. David Leeper (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
