 | | sub programs
|
|
Hi I wonder if I can call a sub program (another vi) within a program. There is an icon command for inserting another vi program into a program, but it does not seem to be a usable function though. Please advise. I understand the maximum of (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: combining LDCC and NQC style automation?
|
|
(...) Ah, so you have dabbled with LDCC? Gave up? Not enough fun for the amount of effort? Or will you be going back to it? (...) Oh, I was just expecting to send power out the top of the motor to light the light, and have a small technic motor (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: combining LDCC and NQC style automation?
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) [snip] (...) Sorry, I should have thought of that when crossposting to .robotics.rcx (URL) picture has a good view of the headlight and the trolley poles. The trolley poles are the long things on the roof that pick up the power (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: combining LDCC and NQC style automation?
|
|
Chris, Thanks for asking these questions. I think this has been discussed before, but it is always good to rehash this at least for the .trainheads! I think that remote train operation and LDCC etc is very exciting but perhaps only for the strong (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: combining LDCC and NQC style automation?
|
|
(...) Chris, I'm not up on my trolly design. Can you explain or show pictures of the "lights" and "trolly poles" You can not use NQC and LDCC. It's like running two operating systems on your PC. Only one works at a time. Steve (20 years ago, 13-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | combining LDCC and NQC style automation?
|
|
OK, so I made a trolley go back and forth using NQC and my RCX. My wife's response to this was, "I that why you wanted a Mindstorms set?" Her tone implied that while whe thought it was cool, she also thought that I had just reached a new level of (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New NQC API for RCX-Spybot or RCX-RC communication
|
|
(...) I forgot to include a few #defines: #define SERIAL_PACKET_RC 0 // default #define SERIAL_PACKET_SPYBOT 0 #define SERIAL_COMM_RC 7 // 4800/76KHZ/25% #define SERIAL_COMM_SPYBOT 7 // was SERIAL_COMM_4800 + SERIAL_COMM_76KHZ The RC function, by (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX seems outputs different power levels
|
|
(...) snip (...) Well first thing I'd do is try it without ganging the outputs - that's really only required if you're going to be drawing a large current, and it doesn't sound like your trolley does that. ROSCO (20 years ago, 12-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RCX seems outputs different power levels
|
|
Last night I decided to redesign my point to point trolley program. I decided to connect the three RCX outputs in parallel (as suggested by some of LDCC documentation). I also decided to use one of sensor inputs to set the power setting. When I (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | New NQC API for RCX-Spybot or RCX-RC communication
|
|
Recently I happened across the MindScript headers for the RCX in the SDK and saw some interesting macros for RCX communication. I decided to port them to NQC and possibly add them to the official built-in NQC API. I would be extremely grateful if (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC API for the new Swan firmware
|
|
(...) I would in this case prefer the second - I actually use a "kMyNamedConstant" convention in my code, and find it very nice to have the API constants very easily seperable from my constants. (...) Again, personally I would prefer that, as it (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | NQC API for the new Swan firmware
|
|
I am working feverishly on updates to NQC which will include extensions to the built-in API in support of Dick Swan's new firmware. My intent is to be consistent with the existing NQC API. However, there are some issues I am debating and I would (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: LNPd keeps sending TX_FAILURE
|
|
(...) Here is my ls -l: tyler@gyro life $ ls -l /dev/ttyS0 lr-xr-xr-x 1 root root 5 Jan 9 05:01 /dev/ttyS0 -> tts/0 tyler@gyro life $ ls -l /dev/tts/0 crw-rw---- 1 tyler tty 4, 64 Jan 9 11:17 /dev/tts/0 I've tried running as root and as tyler, (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNPd keeps sending TX_FAILURE
|
|
(...) hmmm, bad. I never did much wich lnp, but it worked on my machine. (...) I hope so :) Reading the problem description in your first posting gives me a knot in my brain. Next possible problem is a problem with the rights for your /dev/ttySx. If (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNPd keeps sending TX_FAILURE
|
|
(...) I tried the PARENB | PARODD fix. All it did was prevent the PC from receiving anything from the RCX, and it still didn't send anything. Is there anything I missed? (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNPd keeps sending TX_FAILURE
|
|
(...) Keep in mind that lnpd out of the box does _not_ work with brickOS out of the box! This item was discussed in this forum several times, you should search for lnpd in older postings. The next version of brickOS will be accompanied by an updated (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNPd keeps sending TX_FAILURE
|
|
I don't use LNPd or BrickOS so I don't know if this will work. It makes all sorts of problems go away when using the RCX ROM message handling routines, I don't know how much of the ROM routines are used by LNPd or whether, if it doesn't, it has (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Robolab Documentation
|
|
The replacement firmware has several modes for displaying the clock. HH.MM, MM.SS and M.SS.S. The first format is the Lego standard whcih I find failry uninformative. The clock is reset to zero whenever RCX is powered up although many IDE's reset it (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 1.0 compatibility mode
|
|
(...) I know I got stung with it when I first installed the IDE, not having it woulda saved me a couple of posts to Lugnet :) ROSCO (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 1.0 compatibility mode
|
|
(...) I think if they need NQC V1, they won't have this new IDE. If they have the new IDE, they won't have NQC V1.x (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
