 | | Assembly tool?
|
|
Hello, I was wondering what tool I need to compile the pbFORTH asm files. I have the tools that are used for legOS--is there something there that can assemble the asm files? Thanks, Jonathan (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: Does NQC support arrays?
|
|
Depending on what the value in the array needs to be you could use a bitmap (e.g. if you want to store true/false to denote the presence of something)... you could then represent the decimal value of the "array" of ones and zeros ... so, for (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Does NQC support arrays?
|
|
Hari Wiguna <hari@mindvision.com> wrote in message news:FBx2nH.B42@lugnet.com... (...) Nope, it doesn't. This is due to a limitation in the RCX environment. If it did support arrays you could have a max of 32 elements (assuming you didn't have any (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Does NQC support arrays?
|
|
I'm building a BrickCode Reader. Basically it reads a stack of 2x2 bricks of various colors like a barcode. I've managed to hack together a prototype BrickCode Reader. I can feed it a stack of bricks and it beeps different tones based on which color (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Download at www.multimania.com
|
|
Hi, I'm not sure exactly why this is, but for some reason I can't get a binary download to work from .. (URL) .. Whenever I try and download any of the files from this server ( using both a PPP line at home, and the connection at Uni.) I get (...) (25 years ago, 16-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | differences between 9719 and 9747?
|
|
What are the exact differences between Mindstorm pack 9719 and 9747 ? -- ***...*** Stefan Prescher prescher@hermes.fho-emden.de (25 years ago, 16-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 1.3 released - Command Center?
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) DOH! Yup. I've gotten quite fond of the RCXCC/NQC combination. It handles just about anything that I have thought up so far! DLC (25 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: firmdl question
|
|
(...) I believe the units are tens of firmware bytes downloaded already. Oh, to point out the obvious, this is a ROM thing, not a firmdl thing. -Kekoa (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Rom sensor read routine
|
|
(...) The current LegOS model really hammers the sensors, almost to the point of oversampling them. It only takes a short while (less than 0.1 ms, I think) to sample all four sensors; I think LegOS samples the next sensor immediately after finishing (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | firmdl question
|
|
When using firmdl to download a program to the RCX, what exactly do the numbers on the LCD indicate? Are there units I should be attaching to them, or are they just there to indicate progress without specific units? Just curious- Luis ###...### God (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Multitasker test script
|
|
Perhaps I should not have stripped all the comments for speed :) \ The rationale for the delay above and the delay after the IR flash is \ that the message is 77 bits of 417 microseconds each, a total \ transmission time of 32 milliseconds, the (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: Multitasker test script
|
|
(...) It was this line that trashed the task chain when the power button was pressed, I thought I'd checked it a few times but perhaps it was something else. (...) Yes. What I really want is an equivalent of SendMessage in NQC (which maps to opcode (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: Rom sensor read routine
|
|
Hi Kekoa, (...) I am fixing this right now. (...) The current legOS sensor read cycle is this (i=illuminate, c=A/D conversion) S1: iii iii iii ccc S2: ccc iii iii iii S3: iii ccc iii iii S4: iii iii ccc iii If you find your sensor 2 readings to be (...) (25 years ago, 2-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Multitasker test script
|
|
John, I've been looking at your ping routine and note the following... Even if FF EMIT did not block, the wait makes things irrelevant. At 2400 baud, the FF is out the port within 4 msec. In fact, if EMIT did not block, you could probably wait jsut (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | FORTH documentation on line
|
|
No, it's not documentation for pbFORTH - yet. I have found a decent book on line, it is Tim Hendtlass's Real-Time FORTH book. It is really geared for FPC, a dialect that is available for the PC, but the sections on numbers, stack manipulation, (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | RE: Multitasker test script
|
|
John, I tried to put this part of the code into my test script without the ping word and it worked fine. Yes, I uncommented the line that does not work for you. I'm going to have a closer look at ping...I wonder if it's running out of stack or doing (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: Multitasker test script
|
|
Here it is, it is working, but is waiting for IR_MODE_HI, STOP and a non-blocking EMIT. There is a light sensor on the centre connector pad. .dp displays proximity in the LCD as DEFCON.RawLight alternating with the average ambient raw light sensor (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | RE: Multitasker test script
|
|
(...) Post away! Two heads (too bad there only seem to be two of us :-( are usually better than one! Cheers, Ralph Hempel - P.Eng ---...--- Check out pbFORTH for LEGO Mindstorms at: (URL) ---...--- Reply to: rhempel at bmts dot com ---...--- (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: Multitasker test script
|
|
My DEFCON code multitasks OK (except when it tries to STOP). I doesn't actually work yet because it needs SendMessage (or non-blocking EMIT) but I'll post it here if anyone is interested (actually I'll post it unless anyone objects). (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 1.3 released - Command Center?
|
|
(...) I assume you meant "RcxCC". Last I heard from Mark, it will be "soon". I'm pretty sure you can just replace nqc.exe and rcx.nqh in RcxCC with the 1.3 versions. There won't be templates/hilighting for any new commands, but at least you will be (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
