|
|
 | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Hempel [mailto:rhempel@bmts.com] Sent: Saturday, May 01, 1999 1:29 PM To: robots@jpsc.co.uk Subject: RE: New pbFORTH DUH. I called it pball103c.txt instead of .zip! You should be able to find the file under (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: multitasker
|
| -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Hempel [mailto:rhempel@bmts.com] Sent: Saturday, April 17, 1999 7:08 PM To: robots@jpsc.co.uk Subject: multitasker John, I have got the tasker to work, there's a bug in the pbFORTH kernel right now that'll keep (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Hempel [mailto:rhempel@bmts.com] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 1999 8:37 AM To: robots@jpsc.co.uk Subject: RE: New pbFORTH (...) Yes, the MARKER and the tasker are incompatible, since the task chain is independent of (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Hempel [mailto:rhempel@bmts.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 1999 7:37 AM To: robots@jpsc.co.uk Subject: RE: New pbFORTH (...) That is correct if you look at Kekoas description on his internals page, although he (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Hempel [mailto:rhempel@bmts.com] Sent: Friday, May 07, 1999 9:19 AM To: robots@jpsc.co.uk Subject: RE: New pbFORTH (...) I really don't know, John. I'll have to experiment a bit too :-) I've gotten really (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Hempel [mailto:rhempel@bmts.com] Sent: Friday, May 07, 1999 12:10 PM To: robots@jpsc.co.uk Subject: RE: New pbFORTH (...) True enough, but MARKER should make it easy for him once the software is in the RCX, (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Hempel [mailto:rhempel@bmts.com] Sent: Sunday, May 09, 1999 10:18 AM To: robots@jpsc.co.uk Subject: RE: New pbFORTH (...) I'll have a llok at this shortly. How do you feel about pbFORTH after the discussion so (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Hempel [mailto:rhempel@bmts.com] Sent: Monday, May 10, 1999 10:01 AM To: robots@jpsc.co.uk Subject: RE: New pbFORTH (...) Yikes! The NQC portion of the upload should work every time. Are you RCX tower batteries (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Hempel [mailto:rhempel@bmts.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 1999 9:47 AM To: robots@jpsc.co.uk Subject: RE: New pbFORTH John, (...) My FORTH is rusty too. I looked at the source for 15 minutes and did some fiddling (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 1999 11:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) How could I have forgotten... I've looked at that 'till I'm blue in the face. (...) Of (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Monday, May 10, 1999 5:06 PM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) What operating system? - I only have NT here. (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: Ir transmission
|
| -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...ugnet.com] On Behalf Of John Cooper Sent: Monday, May 10, 1999 6:07 AM To: lugnet.robotics.rcx....lugnet.com Subject: Re: Ir transmission (...) I can't get EMIT to work, (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Friday, May 07, 1999 11:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) OK, will do. (...) Yes, on the surface. People always want to improve on things in their own (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Monday, May 10, 1999 6:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) I'm not really interested in Java, if I were going to go that sort of route with a (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Sunday, May 09, 1999 5:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH and indeed PAUSE does work, even if SystemTask is the only one in the chain. There may be something (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Sunday, May 09, 1999 5:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) SENSOR_READ has changed, I think the sense of the result is different 4000 POWER_GET returns (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Friday, May 07, 1999 8:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) Am I doing something wrong here (my FORTH is a bit rusty)? : .VOLTAGE RCX_POWER [ HEX ] 4001 (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Friday, May 07, 1999 7:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) Actually, I thought that anything running interactively (or I suppose more accurately not (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 1999 10:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) Well, I'm not in a position that I really need MARKER with the multitasking testing, just a (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 1999 10:13 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) Definately 2 (...) I couldn't see it earlier, but I see now that the voltage in millivolts (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
|
