 | | RE: Whitespace and comment remover in perl
|
|
(...) OOPS! I guess that those pesky regexps are not for the faint of heart. The new Tcl standard also allows you to specify less greedy regexps. The nesting of comments as you suggest is illegal FORTH anyways. It only specifies that a close comment (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: Whitespace and comment remover in perl
|
|
(...) Your statement of the LONGEST match may be correct for TCL but not for perl! look at the second regexp: the '?' inside means expand to the smallest match ( this is a perl specialty i think) the only thing is, if you nest comments like ( (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | RE: Whitespace and comment remover in perl
|
|
(...) <snipped script> Carsten, This is a good start. Here's my comments on each of the regexp lines... By the way, my Tcl script handles most of this stuff properly, but I'm waiting until the new year to develop XMODEM uploads for it.... (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Whitespace and comment remover in perl
|
|
Hello, i've written a little perl script, which removes white spaces and comments from a forth source code. If called without any parameters, it reads from STDIN and writes to STDOUT. If called with 1 parameter, this parameter is interpreted as an (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: wired expiriences UPLOADING & SAVE-IMAGE
|
|
(...) Ok yesterday evening i tryed to track down this problem. Using a y cable and my old terminal. The communication starts normaly. The first frame was transmitted correct, 'rx' answered with <ACK> but the RCX never sees the <ACK>. If i type the (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: (Failed) Getting LegOS 0.2.2 working on Windows
|
|
Strange. I got my cygwin through the cygnus site, but as far as i can tell it's the same as the one on arthurdent. Mine comes from one of the mirrors on ftp://go.cygnus.com/...n/latest/. The file is called full.exe. (...) Make --version gives me: (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: (Failed) Getting LegOS 0.2.2 working on Windows
|
|
It is quite possible that there is a versioning problem here. The cygwin on arthurdent is reasonably new (August?), but not exactly cutting edge. Peter provided me with links to everything except that, so I provided my own. If he'll provide me with (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: (Failed) Getting LegOS 0.2.2 working on Windows
|
|
(...) I tried this on a NT 4 machine with little success. First of I got the message: chili : /legOS make for i in util lib boot demo ; do make -C $i || exit -1 ; done i was unexpected at this time. make: *** [all] Error 1 After replacing the make (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | A Hosting Offer (was Re: Getting LegOS 0.2.2 working on Windows)
|
|
Thanks are due to Peter for the perserverance to get this thing working. On a related note, there has been quite a bit of legOS related development lately, and since I have (for the near future- a year and a half at least) unlimited bandwidth and (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Getting LegOS 0.2.2 working on Windows
|
|
Instructions to get a working LegOS 0.2.2 on Windows are at: (URL) Much thanks is due to Luis Villa for editing and hosting. Peter (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: wired expiriences UPLOADING & SAVE-IMAGE
|
|
(...) Taken out of context, this sentence is a bit strange :-) Think of Bill Clinton... (...) Hmm, have you tried breaking your source into smaller chunks? What is the definition that is failing. I have lots of scripts that are 2K or more and they (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: wired expiriences UPLOADING & SAVE-IMAGE
|
|
(...) I've tried different positions even under my desk. But it won't work. after 500 - 1000 chars the first transmission error occurred normally inside a word definition. (...) i've done this already (yesterday evening). In perl. If there is a need (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | RE: wired expiriences UPLOADING & SAVE-IMAGE
|
|
Sergey wrote... (...) Sergey, would you like me to bundle your Java uploader with pbForth releases? Cheers, Ralph Hempel - P.Eng ---...--- The train stops at the train station, The bus stops at the bus station, So why am I sitting at a work station? (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | RE: wired expiriences UPLOADING & SAVE-IMAGE
|
|
(...) Yes, you are right. I have the char delay to about 10 or 20 msec and the line delay at 100msec. Remember that your monitor and other IR sources may interfere with comms to the RCX. Try fresh batteries and put the bot and tower under a box... I (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: wired expiriences UPLOADING & SAVE-IMAGE
|
|
Hi Carsten, Nice to see an interest to the subject (even not so cheerful ;) Ok, first question, you are right, it's quite boring. But this is the price for "power". I believe that only direct byte-code uploading will be faster. My only suggestion - (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: compiling 0.2.2 (legos.srec)
|
|
(...) I've encountered the same problem. But it can be resolved, by adding a trailing / to the LEGOS_ROOT variable in Makefile.common Regards Carsten (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | wired expiriences UPLOADING & SAVE-IMAGE
|
|
Hello, first of all, i'll have to say, that i'm very glad to have a FORTH on the RCX but, and the but is a big one, there are some problems if you want to develop some even small pieces of code. First of all, the downloading of source is very (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS applications
|
|
(...) Great! Is there any documentation on that, more precisely how it is to be used? Has it been tested? I don't have access to my PC until the end of the year, so I can't check if there is anything in the distribution... :-( /Vlad (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: FSMs, coding techniques and other goodies
|
|
(...) I was thinking about that. The problem is that I lack the time... for the next couple of months, anyway... The idea of using a higher level language comes from the guess that it would be faster to develop than a graphical tool. Plus that it (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: How did you made nqc?
|
|
(...) I started to compose a reply, but it wandered a bit off-topic and was getting quite long. I posted the resulting text here: (URL) this the sort of thing you were looking for, or perhaps more in-depth explanation of some of the algorithms used, (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
