Subject:
|
Re: FSMs, coding techniques and other goodies
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx
|
Date:
|
Tue, 14 Dec 1999 07:34:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1193 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx, Markus L. Noga writes:
> why don't you write a graphical FSM generator?
I was thinking about that. The problem is that I lack the time... for the next
couple of months, anyway... The idea of using a higher level language comes
from the guess that it would be faster to develop than a graphical tool. Plus
that it would be easier to make it portable.
But yes, I fully agree that a graphical tool would be best.
/Vlad
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: FSMs, coding techniques and other goodies
|
| Vlad, why don't you write a graphical FSM generator? Textbook FSMs are quite powerful, but in practice, states and transitions are usually augmented with enter/hold/leave actions. This provides plenty of configuration potential. Also, there's a (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
