Subject:
|
Re: Sonar and the handyboard
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.handyboard
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Mar 1997 18:08:12 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Tom Brusehaver <tomb@%antispam%netperceptions.com>
|
Viewed:
|
1721 times
|
| |
|
|
> You mentioned that the INIT has the 330ohm. I'm pretty
> sure it's the BINH and NOT the INIT that should have the 330ohm.
> Reread Kents documentation. I don't think you would have damaged
> the unit in this short of time.
I wouldn't think so.
I am looking in Kents documentation, and sure enough, there is
something about putting a resistor on BINH. Also something about
putting a cap in C7 on the ranging board. I'll play with things
tonight.
> Like I've mentioned on many occasions. I STRONGLY think that
> the developers of the ranging unit socketed that silly chip
> 'cause they knew it was prone to failure.
Good thinking :-)
> Is your source of the board close?....
I got it from Ben Wirz.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Sonar and the handyboard
|
| Tom, I put the cap in too - never noticed much defference. It must just be for some minimal filtering of noise. I don't know how well you know Ben, but it sounds as though you will probably be fixing this one solo, eh? Do you have manuals? I'll look (...) (28 years ago, 21-Mar-97, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Sonar and the handyboard
|
| Tom, You mentioned that the INIT has the 330ohm. I'm pretty sure it's the BINH and NOT the INIT that should have the 330ohm. Reread Kents documentation. I don't think you would have damaged the unit in this short of time. Like I've mentioned on many (...) (28 years ago, 21-Mar-97, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
