To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / Search Results: robotic vision
 Results 141 – 160 of about 1600.
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  They say - Be careful what you ask for ... You might get it
 
Yesterday I asked the board of our senior citizens computer club to authorize the purchase of the Lego Mindstorms Robotic Invention kit so we could use it to learn about robotics. They approved it! Now all I have to do is write a few powerpoint (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 

robotic
(score: 0.530)

  Lego Kit to go with Fred Martins "Robotic Explorations" and the Handy Board
 
Hi, Newbie here. I lead a senior citizen Tech Forum and we are planning to work our way through Martin's text book. We have a Handy Board but no Lego components. I've been searching the Lego site for a kit to use. Basically we need the Lego (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 

robotic
(score: 0.530)

  Re: Lego Kit to go with Fred Martins "Robotic Explorations" and the Handy Board
 
(...) Well, you see them coming up on eBay all the time (although not without the RCX controller) - I just did a search and saw them selling in the $80 to $100 range. However, if you don't need it, you can sell the RCX by itself via eBay - they are (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 

robotic
(score: 0.530)

  Re: Lego Kit to go with Fred Martins "Robotic Explorations" and the Handy Board
 
(...) Hi Steve, In addition to the other suggestions, if you find you need individual components you may want to browse the various shops on (URL). Maggie C. (20 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
 

robotic
(score: 0.530)

  Re: Lego Kit to go with Fred Martins "Robotic Explorations" and the Handy Board
 
(...) Tried Pitsco? (URL) (20 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 

robotic
(score: 0.530)

  TexLUG Austin 6/12 meeting report; sumo contest results
 
Folks, Attending the 6/12 Texlug Austin meeting were: Kurt Baty David Perdue Lee Rahe Tim Rueger and many assorted others (see below) We held the first TexLUG Austin Lego Mindstorms Sumo Robotics contest. About twenty people were in attendance, from (...) (20 years ago, 15-Jun-05, to lugnet.org.us.texlug, lugnet.loc.us.tx.aus, lugnet.loc.us.tx, lugnet.robotics)
 

robotic
(score: 0.529)

  BlueTooth bad, Zigbee good
 
(...) Bluetooth is actually very poor for embedded or robotic applications. It's a power hog, development tools are expensive (try $5000 minimum), true peer to peer modules are almost impossible to get unless you are a Fortune 500 company, and the (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 

robotic
(score: 0.528)

  BT headsets and...
 
(...) My remarks were made comparing the power use of advertised BT chips vs 900-MHz and 2.4 GHz RF chip sets based on what was available a couple of years ago. To answer your question about headsets, I will speculate since I don't really know. But (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 

robotic
(score: 0.528)

  Re: Group project: RCX units run emergence simulation
 
(...) Hi! Cool. Now I'm a cohort ;-) (...) Well, sort of... the robotic forklift I brought to HoB is currently the most complex module (that I *know* about) that requires an RCX, but there are some other options. A ball-sorting mechanism is (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-05, to lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
 

robotic
(score: 0.526)

  Robotic simulators
 
Here's a question for the group: Lately I've been researching robotic simulation tools such as Webots, and Player/Stage/Gazebo. Has anyone seen, heard, or thought of a visualizing robotic simulator that works with LDraw models? In other words, you (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 

robotic
(score: 0.525)

  Re: Swarm?
 
(...) Not quite a swarm, but I ran a student project a couple of years ago with the aim of simulating herding sheep. A robotic dog that "barked" and robotic sheep that were more or less frightened of the dog depending on how near it was. It was a (...) (21 years ago, 6-May-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 

robotic
(score: 0.525)

  Re: Robotic simulators
 
Dan (...) new (...) tech, (...) the (...) I don't think it's a technical problem, I think it's down to budgets. It _can_ be done well (or at least faked well) on a PC but it costs too much. 90% of users don't care and the accountants who run games (...) (21 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 

robotic
(score: 0.525)

  Re: Robotic simulators
 
Steve (...) No. Even in the 2D version, you can have different weight distribution, different motors and gears and any number of different wheels arranged where you like with akerman steering, skid steering, idler wheels, casters, etc. Then the (...) (21 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 

robotic
(score: 0.525)

  Re: Robotic simulators
 
Dan and Steve I worked on this a couple of years ago. Not for Lego but for a Robot Wars game. (We failed to get the contract from the BBC.) I have a 2D simulator for the "gameplay" - the computer controlled robots attack, defend, run away and avoid (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 

robotic
(score: 0.525)

  Re: Robotic simulators
 
hi Tim -- --- Tim Gould <t.gould@yahoo.com>, (...) Just so I understand... LDD (from what I can tell, it runs very buggy on my XP machine) is similar to MLcad with the added feature that you can test-drive movable parts (like a tecnic linkage -- not (...) (21 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 

robotic
(score: 0.524)

  Re: Robotic simulators
 
Hey, I really appreciate the input from ppl who have actually worked on this sort of stuff. It happens to be an area I am actively researching, and I'm fascinated by how difficult it seems to be to do good simulations. The consensus seems to be that (...) (21 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 

robotic
(score: 0.524)

  Re: Robotic simulators
 
(...) As hard as this was - it would only have to have been 'good enough' to fool the naked eye - and the robots themselves would (presumably) have been designed by you with only a handful of design variations. Trying to make a simulation that (...) (21 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 

robotic
(score: 0.524)

  Re: Robotic simulators
 
(...) The thing I hate about ODE is that it doesn't like you giving it real-world units. If I have a little kart model (such as the demo model that comes with ODE), and it has a mass of about 1 unit, with appropriate spring stiffnesses, etc, (...) (21 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 

robotic
(score: 0.524)

  Re: Robotic simulators
 
--- Steve Baker <sjbaker1@airmail.net> wrote: [3D Lego simulator] (...) I'd be interested to hear about your experiences. The codebase I'm looking at is called Gazebo ((URL) it sits on top of ODE, and seems to do a pretty good job of simulating (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 

robotic
(score: 0.524)

  Re: Robotic simulators
 
(...) We have talked about this for a while before. I think it's a very big problem to solve all of the physics stuff adequately at the brick-by-brick level. The visualisation doesn't give me quite so many worries (but then I work as a graphics (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 

robotic
(score: 0.524)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR