Subject:
|
Re: lack of interest in basic stamp and basicx
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Nov 1999 20:13:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
835 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Vlad Dumitrescu writes:
> In lugnet.robotics, Ralph Hempel writes:
> > It's funny, but a lot of what you need to do to write good Forth is
> > done for you under the hood by C compilers. The wierd thing is
> > that a C compiler intermingles data and return values on one stack
> > while Forth separates them.
>
> I agree that Forth is better than many other languages in many ways. What I • was
> saying was that it has a different look-and-feel and one needs to get used to
> it first. Plus that it is not very easy to switch from for example C to Forth
> and back all the time... ;-)
But very refreshing gymnastic, isn't it?
;-)
Sergey
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: lack of interest in basic stamp and basicx
|
| (...) I agree that Forth is better than many other languages in many ways. What I was saying was that it has a different look-and-feel and one needs to get used to it first. Plus that it is not very easy to switch from for example C to Forth and (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
