Subject:
|
Re: lack of interest in basic stamp and basicx
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Nov 1999 14:33:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
595 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Ralph Hempel writes:
> It's funny, but a lot of what you need to do to write good Forth is
> done for you under the hood by C compilers. The wierd thing is
> that a C compiler intermingles data and return values on one stack
> while Forth separates them.
I agree that Forth is better than many other languages in many ways. What I was
saying was that it has a different look-and-feel and one needs to get used to
it first. Plus that it is not very easy to switch from for example C to Forth
and back all the time... ;-)
> Now that Sergey has a SAVE-IMAGE which sends an SREC file of the image and
> Dave Baum is working on a 4x firmware uploader, the edvelopment time is
> MUCH faster.
I look forward to see that done!
Just a thought: with SREC image and uploading, one need no longer use the
terminal but for testing and incremental changes. Then Ralph's "old" Tcl/Tk
interface might resurrect into a slightly new form, perhaps a RcxCC for Forth?!
/Vlad
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | RE: lack of interest in basic stamp and basicx
|
| (...) It's funny, but a lot of what you need to do to write good Forth is done for you under the hood by C compilers. The wierd thing is that a C compiler intermingles data and return values on one stack while Forth separates them. (...) Now that (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
