To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 6959
6958  |  6960
Subject: 
Re: a couple of new-bot questions from a generally quiet lurker
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Mon, 20 Sep 1999 11:08:45 GMT
Original-From: 
S. Crawshaw <[sc10003@eng.cam.ac.]stopspammers[uk]>
Viewed: 
597 times
  
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, dave madden wrote:

=>From: "Stephen P. Gibbons" <steve@aztech.net>
=>...
=>My biggest gripe with this design [differtrans] is that there is no
=>way to get all motors contributing to a single effort in one
=>direction.


If you have even more differentials, you could set up the "turning" motor
so that its power is split - one direction turns (this limits you to
turning one way, but there are always sacrifices), and the other side
adds to the forward drive (put this shaft and the "drive" motor into yet
another differential and drive the "drive" part of the differtrans with
the body of this differential. Uses only 4 diffs., no problem!

Stuart



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: a couple of new-bot questions from a generally quiet lurker
 
=>From: "Stephen P. Gibbons" <steve@aztech.net> =>... =>My biggest gripe with this design [differtrans] is that there is no =>way to get all motors contributing to a single effort in one =>direction. Perhaps you could use two regular motors joined (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)

9 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Robotics

 
Verified and Trusted Team of Hackers
20 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR