To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 6569
6568  |  6570
Subject: 
Re: robotic rovers
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Thu, 26 Aug 1999 08:10:52 GMT
Reply-To: 
nospam-dcchen@pacbell.net-/StopSpammers/nospam
Viewed: 
785 times
  
Ian Warfield wrote:
Incidentally, has anyone tried to combine a rotation sensor and a touch sensor
on the same input?  I've tried programming a sensor task routine to separate
the input signals based on RAW voltage but it's not fast enough to handle
normal movement :(.  With two rotation sensors taking up two inputs, I'm not
looking forward to sharing input 3 with two touch sensors and a light sensor.

Have you tried combining the inputs of the two output motors into a
differential?  If the inputs are counter-rotating, the net differential
body rotation will tell you which side is moving faster, ie:

Motor A ------> Differential <--(Reversed Input) Motor B
     +
     +-----Rotationn Sensor (hooked up to the Diff body)

Make sure Motor A and Motor B are input to the Differential via the same
gear reduction.  If the Rotation Sensor hooked up to the differential is
reading zero then both are moving at the same rate.  If there is a
change, slow or float one side to let the other catch up.

I have also figured that if you connect the two motors to each other (as
well as to their respective outputs), you should lock in their movements
together.  Perhaps you could run this thru a interrupter switch to shut
off this connection while turning.

Dave



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: robotic rovers
 
(...) Yeah... the LDrawn design I came up with is at (URL) I'm very happy with because with two differentials it allows me to track both linear and rotational motion. (25 years ago, 27-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: robotic rovers
 
I have another LDraw(n) rover that I posted in the (URL) group. Only problem is that it's kind of top-heavy, and the motors don't gear down much. Still, it's another design to compare. Incidentally, has anyone tried to combine a rotation sensor and (...) (25 years ago, 22-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)

15 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR