To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 6124
6123  |  6125
Subject: 
Re: Darn those definitions (was: The new Super Car)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Sun, 8 Aug 1999 13:22:34 GMT
Original-From: 
Shawn Menninga <SMQ@DWARFRUNE.spamcakeCOM>
Viewed: 
1221 times
  
At 19:53 07-08-99 GMT, Kevin Baker wrote:
In lugnet.robotics, lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Jim Choate) writes:

A liquid is an incompressible fluid.

A gas is a compressible fluid.


I think you will find that, with the exception of black hole stuff,
everything is compressible.

  Disregarding definitions for the moment and returning to the original
question (can Lego rightly call those parts hydraulic), can we all agree
on the following:

1)  There is a large group of fluids whose volume changes *almost*
linearly with static pressure.  At twice the static pressure they occupy
approximately half the volume.  This group of materials includes (at STP)
oxygen, nitrogen, xenon, helium, and normal atmospheric air, along with
many others.  A mechanical device which makes use of such a fluid to do
useful work is classified as "pneumatic".

2)  There is a large group of fluids whods volume changes *almost* not
at all with static pressure.  At twice the static pressure they occupy
approximately the same volume.  This group of materials includes (as STP)
ethenol, machine oil, mercury, brake fluid, and normal water, along with
many others.  A mechanical device which makes use of such a fluid to do
useful work is classified as "hydraulic".

  Now, with out bothering to mathematically define "almost" and ignoring
those fluids which don't fall into either category, it is still clear that
the device in question is pneumatic, not hydraulic.  Fair enough? :-)

-SMQ                        Shawn Menninga                smq@dwarfrune.com
--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=---=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--
"Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty-five years now, doctor, and I'm
  happy to state I've finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd, Harvey
--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Darn those definitions (was: The new Super Car)
 
What will actually happen, if you fill water into the LEGO pneumatic parts? Will they still work? And will they become hydrolics? Jacob -- Did you check the web site first?: (URL) (25 years ago, 8-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Darn those definitions (was: The new Super Car) (fwd)
 
----- Forwarded message from John A. Tamplin ----- Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 12:26:18 -0500 (CDT) From: "John A. Tamplin" <jat@liveonthenet.com> Subject: Re: Darn those definitions (was: The new Super Car) Sorry, but air is indeed considered a fluid in (...) (25 years ago, 7-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)

14 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Robotics

 
Verified and Trusted Team of Hackers
5 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR