Subject:
|
Re: Compressible fluids
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 9 Aug 1999 16:47:36 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Laurentino Martins <lmartins@[stopspammers]marktest.pt>
|
Viewed:
|
1030 times
|
| |
|
|
I think all of you meant with this discussion is that water don't get substantially denser (thick) from the surface to the bottom, right?
At 17:41 09-08-1999 Monday , Karen Gold wrote:
> Thank you, John!
> Karen
>
>
> > > > incorrect my friend. if water was not compressable at all there would be no
> > > > pressure difference from the top to the bottom.
> >
> > Um, I'm sorry, I honestly didn't want to keep this discussion alive in ANY
> > form but this is silly.
> >
> > The pressure difference from top to bottom results from the weight of the
> > water on top.
> --
> Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
Laurentino Martins
[ mailto:lau@mail.telepac.pt ]
[ http://www.terravista.pt/Enseada/2808/ ]
--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Compressible fluids
|
| (...) Um, I'm sorry, I honestly didn't want to keep this discussion alive in ANY form but this is silly. The pressure difference from top to bottom results from the weight of the water on top. Period. If I put a 6 ton weight (shades of Monty (...) (25 years ago, 9-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
