Subject:
|
Re: LEGO vs. O'Reilly (was Re: RCX 1.5 'paranioa')
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 5 Aug 1999 19:28:35 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@MATTDM.nospamORG
|
Viewed:
|
3043 times
|
| |
|
|
Robert Munafo <munafo@gcctechNO.SPAMcom> wrote:
> I also think LEGO might not like the book because it shifts the market
> towards older, more sophisticated customers who tackle tough problems and
> ask tough questions. Most of the people who will buy an O'Reilly book are
> "engineer types" who will want to make Mindstorms do way more than it was
> designed to do.
As long as they're buying, why would Lego mind?
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LEGO vs. O'Reilly (was Re: RCX 1.5 'paranioa')
|
| (...) More sophisticated customers tend to place a higher demand (i.e. workload) on service and technical support. Also, they tend to spread the word that the system as-supplied is insufficient to do what it was intended. Children tend to be less (...) (27 years ago, 6-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | LEGO vs. O'Reilly (was Re: RCX 1.5 'paranioa')
|
| (...) My "Step 2" was to just go out on the Internet and find the information I needed. There's a lot more on the Internet than anyone will ever manage to fit into a book. I also think LEGO might not like the book because it shifts the market (...) (27 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
