Subject:
|
Re: Mindstorm Robotwars style competition in Southern California/Los Angesles area?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 15 Jan 1999 21:55:23 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
NOSPAM-DCCHEN@PACBELL.stopspammersNET-NOSPAM
|
Viewed:
|
1147 times
|
| |
|
|
I chose the volume model because of it's ease of execution. Just get a
box of the desired dimensions, pop the robot in the box, if it fits, OK,
if not, bump the robot up to the next division or open/unlimited
category. Kinda like the carry-on luggage checker that arilines use.
Not my original idea, seen it used in other robotics competitions.
Dave.
Ian Sinclair wrote:
>
> > I liked the idea of divisions based on number of Motors and Max Absolute
> > Weight instead of based on set usage. It would be too laborious to
> > check each robot to see if only valid set parts were used. Perhaps a
> > box dimension size limit could also be helpful.
> >
> > For Example: Motors Max Weight Volume
> > Light <= 2 1 lb 6"x6"x6"
> > Medium 3 3 lb 12"x12"x12"
> > Heavy 5 6 lb 18"x18"x18"
> > Unlimited ? None None
>
> I know the figures are just a suggested starting point, but I think
> the volume should be a total in cubic inches. For example: the Light
> class above would be 6"x6"x6"=216 cubic inches.
>
> This would off contestants the option to built large & flat, small &
> tall, cube shape as above, or long & lean configurations, or anything
> in between.
>
> The Scottish Lego Rugby sports used a maximum area I believe. I don't
> think they included height.
>
> <ICS>
>
> --
> Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
