Subject:
|
Re: Mindstorm Robotwars style competition in Southern California/Los Angesles area?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 12 Jan 1999 20:57:11 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Paul Speed <pspeed@augustschellANTISPAM.com>
|
Viewed:
|
3365 times
|
| |
|
|
Paul Speed wrote:
>
> Well,
> I agree with number two, but as likely many will point out
> number would probably be disruptive to other 'bots trying to do the
...err... number _one_ would probably be disruptive...
I should proof read better.
> same thing.
>
> -Paul (pspeed@augustschell.com)
>
> Mark Tarrabain wrote:
> >
> > You know, I really believe that disallowing IR is a bad idea.
> >
> > Although I would agree that using the IR to shut down or disable opponents is a Bad
> > Thing(tm), and should result in disqualification, IR usage that can be justifiably
> > used in a non-offensive manner should really be allowed.
> >
> > I can think of two examples right off the top of my head where this could be used:
> >
> > 1) Using IR to function as sonar.
> > 2) In the Freeweight category, where there is no (current) limit on what can be put
> > into a robot, 2 RCX's could theoretically be used in a single robot. They should
> > be allowed to use IR to communicate.
> > --
> > Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
> --
> Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
