 | | Re: RIS 3.0 —Travis Kunce
|
| | | we should be so lucky... if they did anyone one thing on your list i'd be happy. -tk "chrismaker" <chrismaker@noos.fr> wrote in message news:HJo031.1pnA@lugnet.com... (...) years (...) these two (...) canceled? (...) exist (...) a (...) develop (...) (21 years ago, 16-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: RIS 3.0 —John Barnes
|
| | | | I had a random thought regarding the new RIS 3.0. The hand over hand monkey on a string invention set has the new clear plastic enclosed parts - motor and gear boxes. My thought was, I wonder if these parts are components of the new RIS 3.0? Maybe (...) (21 years ago, 17-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RIS 3.0 —Andrew Keyser
|
| | | | Can I see pictures of those parts? I'd be interested if you are talking about clear-case motors.... (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RIS 3.0 —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | | "Legoguy" <legoguy@idwt.net> wrote in message news:HJzLK0.1277@lugnet.com... (...) Motor - (URL) - (URL) - (URL) (21 years ago, 22-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: RIS 3.0 —Andrew Keyser
|
| | | | | | Now that is freaking awesome - but do they supply the same amount of torque as the 'standard' ones do? Also, that gearbox 2, looks nice and all, might come in handy, but I prefer having more control over my placment of gears. I think it would be (...) (21 years ago, 22-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: RIS 3.0 —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | | | | SNIP (...) They did make a clear touch sensor. Well, clear light blue. It came in the Cybermaster sets... (URL) - who just wants more inputs and outputs on his RCX 3.0. Oh, and a power jack, and rf (instead of ir), a wireless cam, and new sensors. (...) (21 years ago, 22-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: RIS 3.0 —Mark Riley
|
| | | | | | | | (...) power (...) What baffles me is why Lego never made a rotation sensor based on a potentiometer. It would be low cost (since it is passive) and offer much better resolution than the current rotation sensor for applications requiring <270 degrees (...) (21 years ago, 22-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: RIS 3.0 —Tim Auton
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) I think there was one for the DACTA sets. It's easy to make your own though. Tim (21 years ago, 22-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: RIS 3.0 —Paul Kleniewski
|
| | | | | | | | "Mark Riley" <markril@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:HK05nw.1Lnu@lugnet.com... (...) rot sensor based on potentiometer can wear out but active mouse ball - like sensor will never loos it's parameters that's why i think they made that br pixel (21 years ago, 26-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: RIS 3.0 —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | | | | (...) Actually they provide more mechanical power than standard RIS motor, at the price of an increased consumption (almost doubled). More info soon in my motor comparison page ;o) Philo www.philohome.com (21 years ago, 22-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: RIS 3.0 —Dan Lauber
|
| | | | | | I think gear blocks like that would be awesome. So long as they still follow standard lego units, they probably convey a lot of advantages over the standard gears. They can probably handle a boatload more torque, great for robots, especially arms, (...) (21 years ago, 23-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RIS 3.0 —
|
| | | | (...) 3.0! 3.0!!! I just spent $200 buying 2.0, and you're telling me there's a 3.0??? Where's that receipt!?!! Seriously, though: I just bought, Tuesday, a RIS 2.0 set, my first RIS set. Is the 3.0 currently available? If not, when will it be (...) (21 years ago, 22-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RIS 3.0 —Steve Baker
|
| | | | (...) No - there is no "3.0". There was talk of it some time ago - but I think we've seen the last of decent Lego robotics sets. I'd very much like to be proved wrong though. I was rather suprised to see that in the latest Pitsco Dacta catalog, (...) (21 years ago, 23-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RIS 3.0 —Colin White
|
| | | | | (...) I don't know about RIS 3.0, but I disagree with you about the latest Pitco Dacta Catalog. I think the latest catalog is the best they have ever done. It places a lot of emphasis on Robotics. Remember there are two catalogs. The Pitsco Ideas (...) (21 years ago, 23-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: RIS 3.0 —Colin White
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.robotics, Colin White wrote: I suspect there are more people using this latter (...) Just a follow-on to my previous post. It is not uncommon to see Lego components used with the Basic Stamp. Also, you can use Robolab with the Basic Stamp. (21 years ago, 23-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RIS 3.0 —Mark Riley
|
| | | | (...) Well, that has been said many times about Technic and this year we ended up getting sets like the backhoe, mars rover and rescue truck. The backhoe has an unprecedented number of pneumatic components, and these components have been redesigned (...) (21 years ago, 23-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
