Subject:
|
Re: JCX vs $100 laptop with a cracked screen
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sun, 9 Feb 2003 16:06:03 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Bruce Boyes <bboyes@^NoMoreSpam^systronix.com>
|
Viewed:
|
606 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
At 09:36 AM 2/9/2003 -0600, Steve Baker wrote:
> I agree that $500 for a robot controller is probably too much for most
> people on this
> list.
For those for whom one RCX does the job, there's no reason to switch. The
original context of this thread was people frustrated by lack of more
processing power and wanting a lot more inputs and outputs.
What about those who are using three - or even more - RCXs when one JCX
would do the job?
I agree with all your other remarks - you summarized things very succinctly.
Bruce
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: JCX vs $100 laptop with a cracked screen
|
| (...) Well, I for one am VERY interested in the JCX. The price is way out of my range, but the power and expandability of the JCX are very compelling. I actually tried to talk Bruce into lending me a JCX for my thesis project which involves a fairly (...) (21 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| ![](/news/x.gif) | | RCX 3.0 vs. JCX = RCX 4.0+
|
| I like the JCX concept. When/If I had $500 to spend on it, I would. I think of JCX as a RCX 4.0 or even 5.0 Before jumping to a 4.0 or a 5.0, I would like to have/see a RCX 3.0 So... if in TLC shoes I would do this: RCX 3.0 = RCX 2.5 - battery (...) (21 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | RE: JCX vs $100 laptop with a cracked screen
|
| Bruce, My opinions are do not necessarily reflect those of my employer. The correct link for the quote is: (URL) article has to do specifically with the fast food business, not traditional product manufacturing or retail sales. It talks about how (...) (21 years ago, 9-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
11 Messages in This Thread: ![RE: JCX vs $100 laptop with a cracked screen -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Rob Limbaugh) (9-Feb-03 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: JCX vs $100 laptop with a cracked screen -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Steve Baker) (9-Feb-03 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: JCX vs $100 laptop with a cracked screen -Rob Stehlik (11-Feb-03 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![RE: JCX vs $100 laptop with a cracked screen -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Roman Ontiyuelo) (11-Feb-03 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![RE: JCX -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Bruce Boyes) (11-Feb-03 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: JCX -Jason S. Mantor (12-Feb-03 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: JCX with other CPUs -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Bruce Boyes) (12-Feb-03 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: JCX -Juergen Stuber (12-Feb-03 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: JCX, tools on Linux -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Bruce Boyes) (12-Feb-03 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![RCX 3.0 vs. JCX = RCX 4.0+ -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Marco Correia) (11-Feb-03 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|