 | | RE: JCX vs $100 laptop with a cracked screen —Rob Limbaugh
|
| | | Bruce, My opinions are do not necessarily reflect those of my employer. The correct link for the quote is: (URL) article has to do specifically with the fast food business, not traditional product manufacturing or retail sales. It talks about how (...) (21 years ago, 9-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: JCX vs $100 laptop with a cracked screen —Steve Baker
|
| | | | | (...) > the JCX comes from and supports it. (...) > away computers just because they upgraded to something newer--nothing wrong with the > 2-year-old system. Laptops are cheaper to replace than fix outside of warranty (esp. if > the screen is (...) (21 years ago, 9-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: JCX vs $100 laptop with a cracked screen —Bruce Boyes
|
| | | | (...) For those for whom one RCX does the job, there's no reason to switch. The original context of this thread was people frustrated by lack of more processing power and wanting a lot more inputs and outputs. What about those who are using three - (...) (21 years ago, 9-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: JCX vs $100 laptop with a cracked screen —Rob Stehlik
|
| | | | | (...) Well, I for one am VERY interested in the JCX. The price is way out of my range, but the power and expandability of the JCX are very compelling. I actually tried to talk Bruce into lending me a JCX for my thesis project which involves a fairly (...) (21 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | RE: JCX vs $100 laptop with a cracked screen —Roman Ontiyuelo
|
| | | | | | | Hi all !!! I am listening JCX, a new word in my small dictionary I am listening too, more sensors and motors in only one robot, really!!!! Where can I see this moster?? Where can I read more information about is?? When and where can I buy one of (...) (21 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | RE: JCX —Bruce Boyes
|
| | | | | | (...) (URL)Where can I read more information about is?? (...) We are targeting 01 April (...) Under $500 for some complete system, which we haven't fully defined yet. At least 1) JSimm.JStamp CPU board with Jstamp 1a) optional JStik CPU board with (...) (21 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: JCX —Jason S. Mantor
|
| | | | | | | OK, you answered a buncha' my questions with thsi one post, but how much is the dev kit ? Are there any other simm stick CPU that have been tested with the dev kit ? I'm not a java guy, so that's the only thing holding me back... (21 years ago, 12-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: JCX with other CPUs —Bruce Boyes
|
| | | | | | | (...) No, but any device with SPI I/O and a few additional I/O bits should work. I have written SPI drivers for 8051s in the past, so I know it's relatively simple. Bruce (21 years ago, 12-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: JCX —Juergen Stuber
|
| | | | | | | Hi Bruce, (...) can you elaborate or provide a few pointers on the software? - It seems to need some proprietary tools for programming, is that true, or are these optional? - Does it run on Linux? Jürgen (21 years ago, 12-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: JCX, tools on Linux —Bruce Boyes
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes: (URL) has some beginner and quick start app notes. (...) The Java level is 100% pure java, open and standard. Use *any* Java development tool you like. I use the Sun JDK 1.4.1 and now prefer the Eclipse IDE. I also use JBuilder, JEdit and (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | RCX 3.0 vs. JCX = RCX 4.0+ —Marco Correia
|
| | | | I like the JCX concept. When/If I had $500 to spend on it, I would. I think of JCX as a RCX 4.0 or even 5.0 Before jumping to a 4.0 or a 5.0, I would like to have/see a RCX 3.0 So... if in TLC shoes I would do this: RCX 3.0 = RCX 2.5 - battery (...) (21 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
