To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 20174
20173  |  20175
Subject: 
Re: RCX & RIS, a fading glory? - Advanced alternatives: JCX, Embedlets
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Thu, 30 Jan 2003 21:23:39 GMT
Original-From: 
Bruce Boyes <bboyes@systronix.com{AvoidSpam}>
Viewed: 
1815 times
  
At 03:56 PM 1/30/2003 -0500, Kyle McDonald wrote:
Bruce Boyes wrote:

We plan to sell some kit of JCX sufficient for initial work for about
US$500, which is a fraction of competitive robot products.

This is good news! What type of packaging will it be in? What has
kept me away so far is the idea of the boards being just 'out in
the open' vs the RCX's nice hard LEGO compatible shell.

One of the "sticky bits" has been designing a manufacturable Lego(tm)
compatible connector. We have prototypes and have yet to order the several
thousand for production.

We don't plan an enclosure per se, at least not now, but will use Lego
tiles glued to the base of the backplane:
http://jcx.systronix.com/backpanel.htm (the tiles aren't shown there, just
the backplane). This will let the backplane plug onto Lego bricks. If it
all sells "like hotcakes" other options become thinkable.

Last year an engineer from Lego in Denmark contacted me and we are
planning a product swap and further dialog, so, at some level, Lego is
aware of and interested in JCX. Perhaps Dacta or whomever will pick up
JCX once it becomes "real" and is shipping.

This is interesting news... Are they willing to mold LEGO compatible
cases for your JCX???

Too soon to know. At the moment I admit JCX is vaporware though the alpha
test units have seen heavy use.

One note: the 100x100 mm backplane is also the legal size for mini-sumo
competition.

As you can see on the U of U web page team photos (if you find the right
photos and have really good eyes) we use 9.6V NiMH R/C model battery packs
which put out the same voltage as the 6 x AA in the RCX. We've also used
12V SLA batteries. So far no lego motors have died.

The Cielguard page has some videos of the soccer bots in action. Further
work on these is planned as we believe it may be the first such autonomous
robots.

Here are some other photo links:
http://lapalma.cs.utah.edu/

If there is interest we could post some of the photos and videos on our
website since some of the student sites are already suffering from end of
semester link rot.

Bruce


------- WWW.SYSTRONIX.COM ----------
   Real embedded Java and much more
      High speed 8051 systems
+1-801-534-1017  Salt Lake City, USA



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: RCX & RIS, a fading glory? - Advanced alternatives: JCX, Embedlets
 
(...) I agree whole-heartedly. This is the idea behind JCX which has now been in development for over a year, and has been rather extensively alpha-tested at a major university. This past fall students at the University of Utah were able to use the (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)

33 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Robotics

 
Verified and Trusted Team of Hackers
12 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR