To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 20171
20170  |  20172
Subject: 
Re: RCX & RIS, a fading glory? - Advanced alternatives: JCX, Embedlets
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Thu, 30 Jan 2003 20:40:01 GMT
Original-From: 
Bruce Boyes <bboyes@^avoidspam^systronix.com>
Viewed: 
1916 times
  
At 12:26 AM 1/30/2003 -0500, Kyle McDonald wrote:
Steve Baker wrote:
But there is another approach to the hobby - to actually want to build
robots that can do meaningful things - that push the envelope of what's
possible in robotics - not push the envelope of what's possible with Lego.
For people (like me) who want to do those things, the limitations of the
RCX are not just an amusing problem to circumvent - they actually prevent
you from doing what you'd like to be able to do.   It's extremely frustrating
to be in a situation where you could build a really interesting robot - only
to find you can't because of the arbitary limit of 3 motors and 3 sensors.
Nothing else in Lego is limited in that way.
I agree with this wholeheartedly. And I think that LEGO is missing
out on great opportunities in this market because of these limitations.

I agree whole-heartedly.

This is the idea behind JCX which has now been in development for over a
year, and has been rather extensively alpha-tested at a major university.
This  past fall students at the University of Utah were able to use the
CMUCam vision sensor and build *autonomous* (no PC with the camera on it!)
robots:
http://www.cs.utah.edu/classes/cs4710/teams.html
autonomous checker-playing robot:
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~mundt/cs4710/
soccer playing robots:
http://www.cielguard.com/

We are finally into the move to production on JCX. (If the economy were
better we'd have been done a year ago.) A JStamp CPU board for JCX is being
prototyped this week and work on the RFModem is crawling along.

The point of this message is not only a shameless plug for JCX vaporware
(it's really coming this spring) but to sound an upbeat note that there
will soon be practical alternatives to the RCX for "real, serious" robots
using the Lego mechanicals and sensors and motors (also those of HiTechnic
and other companies).

We plan to sell some kit of JCX sufficient for initial work for about
US$500, which is a fraction of competitive robot products.

Last year an engineer from Lego in Denmark contacted me and we are planning
a product swap and further dialog, so, at some level, Lego is aware of and
interested in JCX. Perhaps Dacta or whomever will pick up JCX once it
becomes "real" and is shipping.

I realize for the purists this is not an answer simply because Systronix is
not located in Denmark and is not part of the Lego group. But if all you
want is a viable, powerful, expandable, open system...

There is also a new 'Embedlet' SourceForge project:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/embedlets/
which touches on the issue of creating firmware and hardware modules which
could easily plug together for variety of applications including robotics.
It's all Java and open standards based, and there is a very active mail
list. And - it's Open Source. (I'm blind copying the embedlets list with
this message). There are some university-level educators active in this
project, too.

So I am very optimistic about the future of Lego robotics! By this summer
there should be a whole raft of interesting new technology available.

Bruce Boyes

http://www.jcx.systronix.com/


------- WWW.SYSTRONIX.COM ----------
   Real embedded Java and much more
      High speed 8051 systems
+1-801-534-1017  Salt Lake City, USA



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: RCX & RIS, a fading glory? - Advanced alternatives: JCX, Embedlets
 
(...) One of the "sticky bits" has been designing a manufacturable Lego(tm) compatible connector. We have prototypes and have yet to order the several thousand for production. We don't plan an enclosure per se, at least not now, but will use Lego (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: RCX & RIS, a fading glory?
 
(...) My profound apologies - I didn't mean it to come out like that. It's dangerous to infer an inflection from an email. That expression frequently means "Wow - that's amazing - I really wish I had the time and patience to do that - but I (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)

33 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR