Subject:
|
Re: articulation points?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 20 Nov 2002 07:56:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1284 times
|
| |
|
|
You present interesting aspects of the term, could it be that the term has
many meanings and really if we understood it correctly we would do justice
to the proper meaning. Context is everything, yet you raise ideas and
examples that indeed correspond. Interesting way to put it.
> Of course, this is how I have always understood things to be and I'm sure my
> line of thinking is wrong in a couple aspects...
>
> - Rob
e
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: articulation points?
|
| (...) I think you've hit the nail on the head here Eric. To me, the most logical way of looking at a robot arm would be from the point of view of the end effector, i.e. what it can and cannot do. The way the arm moves to get there may be of less (...) (22 years ago, 20-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: articulation points?
|
| Everything I've ever seen mentioning DOF refers to absolute reference points (a focus, if you will, or origin) that the range is controlled by. In terms of articuation, each DOF corresponds to a joint, which is a fixed focus point that the range (...) (22 years ago, 20-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
