Subject:
|
Re: extensions from hitechnicstuff
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 19:21:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
714 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
> I can just confirm that they are absolutely well made: not only they
> work perfectly, but they are very professionally cased too.
I would confirm likewise, the products are excellent indeed and well worth
it - I've used the remote control and lightbricks and they are superb.
Jennifer
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: extensions from hitechnicstuff
|
| (...) I concur as well. I have the remote control unit and it has worked flawlessly. It is packaged very professionally and is easy to incoporate into my models. It's definitely worth it. Although I don't have any of the other products offered, I'm (...) (23 years ago, 7-Nov-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: extensions from hitechnicstuff
|
| (...) the (...) As Rob properly said, you have to decide if their functionlity is worth the price. I can just confirm that they are absolutely well made: not only they work perfectly, but they are very professionally cased too. I have John's full (...) (23 years ago, 7-Nov-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
17 Messages in This Thread: ![extensions from hitechnicstuff -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Mathias Uhr) (6-Nov-01 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: extensions from hitechnicstuff -Rob Doucette (7-Nov-01 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: extensions from hitechnicstuff -Mario Ferrari (7-Nov-01 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: extensions from hitechnicstuff -Thomas Avery (7-Nov-01 to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: extensions from hitechnicstuff -Soh Chio Siong (8-Nov-01 to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: extensions from hitechnicstuff -Robin Malton (8-Nov-01 to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: extensions from hitechnicstuff -Dave Chen (4-Jan-02 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: FT vs LEGO pneumatics (was: extensions from hitechnicstuff) -Ross Crawford (10-Nov-01 to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: FT vs LEGO pneumatics (was: extensions from hitechnicstuff) -Soh Chio Siong (10-Nov-01 to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: FT vs LEGO pneumatics (was: extensions from hitechnicstuff) -Horst Lehner (11-Nov-01 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: FT vs LEGO pneumatics (was: extensions from hitechnicstuff) -Larry Pieniazek (11-Nov-01 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: FT vs LEGO pneumatics (was: extensions from hitechnicstuff) -Soh Chio Siong (12-Nov-01 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: FT vs LEGO pneumatics (was: extensions from hitechnicstuff) -Larry Pieniazek (12-Nov-01 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: FT vs LEGO pneumatics (was: extensions from hitechnicstuff) -Soh Chio Siong (12-Nov-01 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: FT vs LEGO pneumatics (was: extensions from hitechnicstuff) -Klaas H. Meijaard (14-Nov-01 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: FT vs LEGO pneumatics (was: extensions from hitechnicstuff) -Rob Doucette (11-Nov-01 to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|