To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / 6098
6097  |  6099
Subject: 
Re: FT vs LEGO pneumatics (was: extensions from hitechnicstuff)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Mon, 12 Nov 2001 01:37:08 GMT
Viewed: 
1344 times
  
Larry Pieniazek wrote:

In lugnet.technic, Horst Lehner writes:

Are you aware that the 8680 Arctic Rescue Base set

<http://guide.lugnet.com/set/8680>

from the Technic Arctic Action theme

<http://guide.lugnet.com/set/?qc=lego/technic/arcticaction>

has two longer pneumatic cylinders. However, these are the older
single-action variety ...

Somehow I can't see opening a MIB copy of this just to get these parts. :-)
Assuming you could find one. But if you found one that had damaged parts,
using stuff from 9705 (or whichever it was) doesn't seem quite so bad.

Well, Larry, you can say there's always some dumb fool who has done it.

As a matter of fact, I did have a MIB 8680 Arctic Rescue Base set. It's
the only thing I have that's got the early pneumatics. So I simply had
to open up the box to see how those early pneumatics work - single
acting using a special one-valve.

Yes, the cylinders therein are very long, the longest ever made by LEGO.
But the piston is rather weak as it's made of plastic and not metal. So
it's not capable of doing real useful work. Maybe I should have just
left them in the unopened box :-(

--
C S Soh

CSSoh's Lego Pneumatics
http://www.geocities.com/cssoh1
... where air is power!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: FT vs LEGO pneumatics (was: extensions from hitechnicstuff)
 
(...) I would not call anyone a "dumb fool" because they decided to open a set and enjoy it... I was just saying I thought it was a bit ironic that this particular (technic holy grail??) set would be a source... Sets are to be enjoyed. I am gonna (...) (23 years ago, 12-Nov-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: FT vs LEGO pneumatics (was: extensions from hitechnicstuff)
 
(...) Somehow I can't see opening a MIB copy of this just to get these parts. :-) Assuming you could find one. But if you found one that had damaged parts, using stuff from 9705 (or whichever it was) doesn't seem quite so bad. (23 years ago, 11-Nov-01, to lugnet.technic)

17 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR