| |
In lugnet.robotics, Bram Lambrecht writes:
[...]
> Type 2 is newer, probably because the Type 1's were too hard to take off the
> axle. I've noticed that most of my loose Type 1's have a hairline fracture
> on one side.
I think this is correct. I once built the "Aliens" type walker,
http://www.brickshelf.com/scans/8000/8891/8891-058.html . I used
Type 2 originally and found that after the thing would walk a few meters
one of the legs would pop off. Didn't have that problem when I switched
to Type 1s.
as evah,
John C.
[...]
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | RE: bushing (bush) question
|
| (...) Type 2 is newer, probably because the Type 1's were too hard to take off the axle. I've noticed that most of my loose Type 1's have a hairline fracture on one side. (...) All the parts with teeth were essentially replaced with functional (...) (23 years ago, 24-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
