To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 16016
16015  |  16017
Subject: 
Re: bushing (bush) question
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic
Date: 
Fri, 24 Aug 2001 22:26:09 GMT
Viewed: 
1162 times
  
In lugnet.robotics, Thomas (T. J.) Avery writes:
In lugnet.robotics, Elijah Meeker <emeeker@austin.rr.com> writes:
So, there are 3 types of 1/2 bushing:

smooth
http://img.lugnet.com/ld/4265c.gif

type 1
http://img.lugnet.com/ld/4265a.gif

type 2
http://img.lugnet.com/ld/4265b.gif


Can anyone tell me why I would want type 1 vs. type 2? Are type 1
functionally different or just the a first try?

They're pretty much the same. But I think Type 1 bushings often have a
tighter fit than Type 2 bushings. It really depends on each specific part
and its particular tolerances. I have some Type 1's that are extrememly
tight fitting, and others that fit loosely.

I keep all my Type 1's and Type 2's in one bin and use them without looking.


Also, anyone have an
idea why they dropped all the toothing I see on older pieces?

I think the biggest reason is that the Type 1's and 2's were prone to
splitting in half. The teeth introduce a high stress concentration and a
crack can easily form. I have split many of these.

Also, the teeth are not often used for anything (e.g. used to lock an axle).
When I use 1/2 bushings, usually I just need a bushing 1/2 thick. I rarely
need to lock an axle from rotating. Besides, the new 1x2 technic bricks with
axle-holes do a much better job of locking an axle.

Note also that Type 1 & 2 are also slightly wider than a smooth 1/2 bush -
about half the thickness of a tooth wider. Two of them butted together (tooth
side) is exactly the same width as 2 smooths (or a single full bush). And as TJ
says, they're noticably tighter fit, so 2 1/2 bushes holds much better than 1
full bush.

ROSCO



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: bushing (bush) question
 
(...) No, I've found that all the half bushes share the same width: 1/2 stud. (...) Again, I've found that two old style half bushes together (with the tooth side facing each other), are _narrower_ than a full bush (or two smooth bushes). They are (...) (23 years ago, 25-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
  Re: bushing (bush) question
 
(...) No, I've found that all the half bushes share the same width: 1/2 stud. (...) Again, I've found that two old style half bushes together (with the tooth side facing each other), are _narrower_ than a full bush (or two smooth bushes). They are (...) (23 years ago, 25-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: bushing (bush) question
 
(...) They're pretty much the same. But I think Type 1 bushings often have a tighter fit than Type 2 bushings. It really depends on each specific part and its particular tolerances. I have some Type 1's that are extrememly tight fitting, and others (...) (23 years ago, 23-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)

13 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Robotics

 
Contact Recovery Nerd for Speedy USDT / BTC Recovery
21 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR