To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 13888
13887  |  13889
Subject: 
Re: The need for chat server - a dissenting opinion
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:25:16 GMT
Viewed: 
523 times
  
Hi

( 01.01.12 03:32 +0000 ) Matthias Jetleb:
Sorry, but I for one have to vote against the idea.

No need to be sorry for a well thought out opinion.

"The cost", as I see it, is this: IRC discussions would not appear in
the Lugnet newsgroups (please correct me if I'm wrong). If it did, I
would think we would end up drowning in chatter and that would detract
from the true usefulness of Lugnet.

I have a feeling most of what would go on would be "chatter" [which is
OK]. You are right, that any useful content that appears in a chat room
would probably not be archived. However, maybe someone in the chat room
would remember what was said there and could post a meaningful reply to
one of the email lists.

While chat and email can work side by side, they most often are
complementary rather than overlapping.

The fleeting nature of IRC means that the only people who will benefit
from discussions are the people where are there at the time.

Not so. As I mention above, someone *could* remember something from the
chat group and then use it to construct and answer [or a pointer] to
someone with a question on the mailing list.

I'm all for it.

I also am doing some work at my company with chat servers, and while I
don't have the hardware to host it, I could possibly help in some way
[java applet client- secondary op].

--
\js

Life isn't about the breaths we take, it's about the moments that take our
breath away.



Message is in Reply To:
  The need for chat server - a dissenting opinion
 
Sorry, but I for one have to vote against the idea. I appreciate that, given IRC's relative immediacy, there are some advantages to being able to get an answer "right now". This assumes, of course, that there is someone on-line with the answer (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)

10 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR